Hi ladies, I was wondering if I could get a reality check for my plan for wedding party attire before I start spreading the word. We've been pretty set on the GM stuff, but it's my side that we've struggled with, and I want to make sure it's reasonable (because after a while, everything starts looking reasonable as long as it means I never have to think about wedding crap again).
Groomsmen:
- Black suits (they all already own one)
- Mismatched ties (which we're providing for them)
- Dress shirt (which hopefully matches the tie)
Therefore, the groomsmen will only be responsible for shoes and socks. And maybe a new dress shirt, if they want.
Bride's side:
- Bridesman: whatever suit he wants, with whatever shirt, with a tie that's provided for him
- BM: a dress that's some variation of lighter blue (which is what they preferred), in whatever length/fabric they choose. No shoes/jewelry/hair/make up requirements except that they probably want to plan for cold weather.
My dilemma is I just found out that my BFF doesn't own a suit that fits, so he'll either have to rent, buy or pay for heavy alteration on a suit he does have. I had already decided to buy my little sister's dress for her, but I really don't like the idea of asking any my folks to pay for anything when the GM cost will be $0 out-of-pocket. My plan was to cover $75 towards rental/alterations/whatever on my side, and if they want to go over that, it'd be up to them to pay the difference. Is this acceptable, or would you think this is weird? We came up with $75 since you can get a suit rental or simple dress for about that much, but I still feel kinda bad that they might have to pay something.
TL; DR: Do you think it's reasonable to pay just $75 flat towards attire for bride's side when groom's side will essentially be covered 100%?
(FYI: no, none of this will be considered their gifts)