OK! After interviewing a ton of photographers, we've narrowed it down to 2!
Any photo experts out there can look at these photos and judge which ones are "better"?
Here's the pros and cons that we've come up with so far:
Why choose Candidate A:
- Super professional. Very polished personality. He's like the Apple of wedding photographers. (And has Apple-like prices... more on that later)
- Will use the 1.5 hour engagement session to "train us" on how to pose and have our photos taken.
- Will be more instructive than Candidate B (who described themselves as photo journalists).
- Amazing album layouts and story telling. This guy really nails it.
- Has taken photos at our venues.
Why choose Candidate B:
- Costs less, but isn't cheap... In fact, Candidate A costs 40%(!!!) more for a comparable package.
- Very laid back people. But this is also potentially a negative.
- My other half thinks Candidate B has better / more interesting pictures on the website. I can't tell.
About us:
- We're not very inspired / spontaneous people. We're both of engineering / financial backgrounds, and it shows in our public personas.
Any photo experts around can take a look and assess the work of these two studios?
Thanks!