Community› Local Wedding Boards› Idaho
Idaho
New Discussion

Help! Honeymoon vs. Videographer

kimberlyphillips1kimberlyphillips1 member
First Comment
in Idaho
We are on a pretty tight budget and I've come to the conclusion that we are going to need to pick between having a professional videographer and having a real honeymoon. I already have the videographer lined up and I'm supposed to send the contract out on Monday, but then I got to really thinking... we could have an amazing honeymoon with the money we would be putting towards the video.

What is your honest opinion on this?? Help!
Report Reply to Post

Re: Help! Honeymoon vs. Videographer

  • barrelbabe004barrelbabe004
    First Anniversary Combo Breaker First Comment
    edited December 2011

    I would go with the honeymoon...
    I think I'd rather have the memories of going somewhere right after I'm married than have a video of my wedding that I'd probably only watch a few times.
    GL with your decision.

    image
    Married
    Taking Control:Updated 1/7
    Report Reply
  • girly.girl_todaygirly.girl_today
    First Comment
    edited December 2011
    I would definitely go with the honeymoon.  Maybe you could supplement your reception photography with disposable cameras for people to take pictures with so that you get some fun funky photos instead of paying the big bucks for a videographer.  And you can always take lots of photos on your honeymoon too :)
    Report Reply
  • kimberlyphillips1kimberlyphillips1 member
    First Comment
    edited December 2011
    I chose the honeymoon :)<3

    We are going to the oregon coast and staying at thyme-and-tide bed and breakfast in oceanside, OR.
    Report Reply
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards