Our wedding isn't until August 2011, but my FI and I are trying to get as much done now as possible (because we know that things will come up and we'll be swamped with stuff in the end). We are currently working on finding a photographer and have it narrowed down to a few. A couple are over what we have budgeted for a photographer.
The question is... if we go with a photographer who is more $$$ (which we honestly could because of some of the gorgeous pictures we've seen) we are thinking about not having a videographer to help with the costs. My only concern is that some day I'll be disappointed that we didn't get the events on video... (/DVD... whatever). I honestly don't have a major problem cutting the videographer but dont know if it'll be a regret later on.
Anyone have thoughts or opinions on this?