Wedding Party

Head Table/Sweetheart Table

FI and are planning to have about 100 people at our wedding, he will have four GM and I will have four BM. We were thinking of doing a sweetheart table but including my MOH and his best man... would that be weird? Has anyone else done this at their wedding or plan to? 
imageDaisypath Anniversary tickers

Re: Head Table/Sweetheart Table

  • If the MOH and BM have dates with them, they need to be included at the sweetheart table, too.  Otherwise I think it's fine.  Newsflash: Guests are not at all interested in how you choose to arrange yourselves to eat so long as they get to sit and eat too.
    Courtesy of megk8oz
    image
    "I think bablingbrooke is the 13 yr old marring her cousin at the town hall. Lets all give her a big hand. And hope her inbred children can live normal lives." -tabs.

    A word of warning from your friends at Cracked.com: Remember that text is going to be how you make your first impression over the internet; if every third word you type is misspelled, people will automatically assume that you're a moron.
  • A sweetheart table is for you and your FI only. If you add BP members, it's a head table. If you have a head table, the proper thing to do is to let your bp members sit with their dates. It's rude to separate dates. 

    Either have a sweetheart table alone, or have a table for 6 so that your MOH and BM can sit with their dates.
    image
    Sunbonnet or cone of shame? You be the judge! Trixie's Blog
    My Planning Bio
    My Married Bio updated March 4
  • If you have your WP (any of your WP) sit with you then their dates need to be included.  Think of it as, if you were their MOH wouldn't you want you DH sitting with you.  If you want to do a sweetheart table, just leave it as you and your DH.  We did this and it was the only time DH and I had alone with each other all day.  If you want to sit with someone then consider sitting with both sets of parents and have a family table.
    Ignorance is a poor defense. Image and video hosting by TinyPic
  • Whatever you do, just include the dates.
    image
  • Just to clear up -- MOH and BM do not have a S/O as of now, if they do they would obviously be invited and included at the table as well.

    I have been to several weddings where the BP sat at the head table without their dates... I always thought that was weird.
    imageDaisypath Anniversary tickers
  • heres the link to a thread in customs and traditions about this very topic...it'll give you some more opinions :D

    http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_customs-traditions_sweetheart-table-vs-head-table
    imageAnniversary
  • Bear in mind anything that comes from TK's "customs" pages...just take them with a grain of salt.

    mandi, I think you've got a good plan in place.  But you've got 20 months to go until the wedding.  This can be placed on the back burner for awhile.
    Courtesy of megk8oz
    image
    "I think bablingbrooke is the 13 yr old marring her cousin at the town hall. Lets all give her a big hand. And hope her inbred children can live normal lives." -tabs.

    A word of warning from your friends at Cracked.com: Remember that text is going to be how you make your first impression over the internet; if every third word you type is misspelled, people will automatically assume that you're a moron.
  • Whatever you do, just don't split established social units.

    As a guest I don't really care where the bride and groom sit.  I only care about seating arragments if I'm split from my husband.  That's just flat out rude.  Period.
  • Every wedding I've been to the bp/dates are always split up.  Maybe that's just a local thing, but I hate that.  Especially if you know no one other than your date and maybe the bride and groom.  It's just plain awkward, and everytime it happens I just keep waiting for dinner to be over so I can get up and talk to my date.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards