PW-ing-Holy crapola...

mrsconn23

Celine Dion's FLA backyard.

LnR70707

jeebus.

loveshine1

No kidding.

She lives in Jupiter, about 30-40 minutes north of where I am.

**O-Face**

I think you meant Jupiter the planet.  That woman is definitely way out there.

How lonely would it be to be an only child in all of that?

loveshine1

Ha yes, she is. So Jupiter is fitting.

zsazsa-stl

Is that a lazy river?

AuntFlo

WANT.

*Barbie*

think she'll adopt me?

hmonkey

i would feel no guilt peeing in a pool that big.

Mrs.Thistletwat

Hmo, I sort of want to go to a water park with you but I am also afraid to.

DG1

good grief, that woman is annoying and ridiculous.

I remember when her kid was born, there was a spread about it in People magazine.  There was a picture of her sitting in a chair holding the baby. Except it was a 2-page spread, and it was really a picture of their "sunroom" or something, and Celine was all of about 1.5" of the picture. 

It really pissed me off that it was all "HEY!  Look at all of my fabulous STUFF!  And, by the way, we had a baby."  Especially since the whole purpose of the article was supposed to be the baby.

And am I the only one who thinks this doesn't look like much fun by itself?  I mean, I don't like huge crowds at water parks, but part of the fun is having other people around. I think I'd get bored going down a water slide by myself over and over and over again. 

A lazy river, on the other hand, htat someone else maintains for me? I might be able to get into that.

NOLABridesmaid

I think they need to ship in some more kids to play in that pool.

hmonkey

[QUOTE]good grief, that woman is annoying and ridiculous. I remember when her kid was born, there was a spread about it in People magazine.  There was a picture of her sitting in a chair holding the baby. Except it was a 2-page spread, and it was really a picture of their "sunroom" or something, and Celine was all of about 1.5" of the picture.  It really pissed me off that it was all "HEY!  Look at all of my fabulous STUFF!  And, by the way, we had a baby."  Especially since the whole purpose of the article was supposed to be the baby.
Posted by DG1[/QUOTE]

oh, dg.  you don't get the point of people magazine <em>at all</em>.

6fsn

holy frijoles.

DG1

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/special-topic-wedding-boards_wedding-woes_pw-ing-holy-crapola?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Special%20Topic%20Wedding%20BoardsForum:47Discussion:eeb6e9a6-3b55-42c8-9021-7267dd43ac05Post:d67b9a84-a49b-41ad-9024-38f0b5b902f4">Re: PW-ing-Holy crapola...</a>:
[QUOTE]oh, dg.  you don't get the point of people magazine at all .
Posted by hmonkey[/QUOTE]


True. But I'll bet this week's spread of Sandra Bullock is going to have actual pictures of her baby instead of just her house.