this is the code for the render ad
Pennsylvania-Philadelphia

what do you think of this wedding timing?

We're having an outdoor wedding at a winery in the poconos.  Buffet hot dinner /wine /beer /sangria /dj /75ish guests.  I moved it a week earlier than i was originally going to do (10/2 i think was the date) because i was worried it might be too cool out. so we're doing 9/25.  now i've been debating the time.  one hour has been driving me nuts. it was between 2-8 and 1-7. i have been leaning towards 1-7 in case it's cooler out when the sun goes down and because it's a sunday and people may want to get home.  How does starting it at 1:30 and ending at 7 sound?  about 30-45 mins for the ceremony (that's what the officiant said is her average) then straight into cocktail hour then reception.  That's still more than long enough right?  Even if it's 2:30-7 for the cocktail hour/reception?

I don't know why i get wrapped up in these little decisions.  First it was over 1 week then it's over 1 hour.  I alternate between it's not enough time and then that people are going to be bored out of their minds and want to go home anyway.  blah.

Re: what do you think of this wedding timing?

  • edited December 2011
    Does your venue give you a timeline?  I believe most venues give you 5 hours....1 hour for cocktails and 4 hours for reception.  Unless yours is open-ended, you might not have the choice.  You would just need to choose your start time.  Since you're having dinner, I would err on the side of a later start.

    ETA: I just re-read your post.  If this is a location that people have to drive over an hour to get to, since its a Sunday, I would say to start earlier.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • peanutty2peanutty2 member
    Third Anniversary 100 Comments
    edited December 2011
    yea they are giving us 6 hours (ceremony/cocktail hour/reception).  we figured if we do the 1:30-7 we could tell the vendor 1-7 and use the extra half hour in the beginning for pictures.   or if we have an extra half hour we don't use so be it. i was just wondering if shortening the cocktail hour/reception to 4.5 hours instead of 5 would really make much of a difference.

    even with the earlier time it sounds like a lot of people are going to be staying over anyway, but i still want to give those who want to get home the option to do so at a reasonable time that's why i was thinking to end it by 7, whether we start at 1 or 1:30.


  • edited December 2011
    I think either way would work fine, but I would probably plan to start earlier at 1 and give yourself a buffer in case things run behind.  If you have your vendor start the clock at 1 and plan to start your ceremony at 1:30 but you don't actually start your ceremony until closer to 2, then you've lost an hour.  You know what I mean?   I wouldn't start your venue timeine until you're ready to start your ceremony.  Can your photographer come earlier, maybe at 11?  Does that make sense?
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • peanutty2peanutty2 member
    Third Anniversary 100 Comments
    edited December 2011
    hmm that's a very good point.  maybe i should just do 1 then and have a little time if anyone is running a little late.
    thank you. i really like that idea.  it might be better to plan for 1 and have the buffer than have the extra half hour.

  • edited December 2011
    HTH, good luck! :-)
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards