Okay, so etiquette-wise, it's considered rude to have a cash bar, correct? The reasoning behind it is that you shouldn't expect your guests to pay for something at a party you're hosting.
How are these viewed, e-wise?:
1. Limited bar only (hosted wine + beer, maybe a signature cocktail)
2. Limited bar with option of non-sponsored drinks available for purchase.
3. Open bar for a limited period of time, followed by a cash bar later.
I know in our circles I've been to both limited bars and cash bars - I don't think I've ever been to an open bar wedding, but I'm not opposed to hosting one if we can afford it. Obviously non-alcoholic drinks will also be available.
I know at one venue I liked for looks, location, venue rental, and food quality & pricing, the least expensive beer & wine only option was nearly twice as much as dinner. Doing the math, for the same amount of money we could host 201 with a dry reception, 74 with limited bar, and 59 for an open bar.
Thanks ahead of time e-ladies!
Formerly known as flutterbride2b