The laws on adoption in my state have just changed. Previously, we were stuck using an Act written in the 60's which prohibited people from adopting children unless they were infertile and married, and didn't encourage the adoption of children who are in the custody of the state due to child protection matters. The new Act has just been released, and I was glad to see that singles are also now able to adopt, people who don't have fertility issues can adopt, and foster parents can adopt in cases where the child cannot be returned to their parents safely. One line about eligibility threw me though, and I wondered what your thoughts on it were, and if it is the same in your area:"the person (applicant) is eligible if the person has a spouse who is not the same gender as the person" Obviously a gay or lesbian person in a relationship could theoretically get around this by not disclosing their relationship and applying as a single, but why should they have to when all of the research evidence suggests that children brought up by same-sex parents are as well-adjusted as their counterparts? There are so many families that consist of two mothers or two fathers, and it saddens me that these kids can not legally be adopted by both parents and officially refer to their parents as such, and that as families they are not afforded the same level of protection (eg. family law court for custody cases etc) as other families in our communities are provided... and that is without even getting into the issue of children needing homes and potentially great parents being denied the ability to provide for these kids because of their gender alone. WDYT, and are same-sex couples able to adopt where you live?