Dress #1

Pros: light, $600 cheaper than #2, love the crisscross bodice and the full skirt, won't look as dated 20 years from now
Cons: "princess" dress, looks like a thousand dresses
dress #2

pros: the bodice and sweetheart neckline, looks more couture, more original
cons: $600 more than #1, very en vouge at the moment, heavy, could look very dated
There you have it girls, I'm in love equally with both dresses and don't know if the big price difference is enough to make me decide one way or the other. Tell me which you choose and why. Thanks again!
Re: Dress debate, last one I promise!
222
I'm sure whatever you choose will be perfect. I'm glad I didn't fall in love with two dresses, I can tell this has been a tough choice for you.
220
Your body looks fantastic in both dresses, you really won't go wrong either way here. Perhaps to try them both on again and see if you get that kick in the gut that tells you which is the right one?
[QUOTE]#1. i love it.
Posted by kirab2[/QUOTE]
<div>
</div><div>this :)</div>
ALTHOUGH the 2nd dress looks amazing on you! and it might be one of my favorite takes on the floral skirt trend. I don't think you can go wrong here.
Bari Jay 911 in Raspberry
http://rusticweddingsc.weebly.com/
My take on the whole trendy thing is, who cares....unless you go with something super, super traditional, it is all going to look dated at som point. and, when, that point comes, I doubt you will care! Look at all theose poor 80's and early 90's brides
[QUOTE]I've loved #1 since you posted it the first time. I asked FI what he thinks as a guy and he said he likes 1 bc it's more flowy and 2 looks like you're a lifesized Barbie cake.
Posted by morenachica110[/QUOTE]
hahahaha leave it to a guy to say that, my friends husband said another one of the dresses I tried on looked like fingers grabbing my boobs. Men have the funniest way of saying things
Fred and Ginger Are Getting Married
*Updated 5.08.12