Community› Local Wedding Boards› New Jersey
New Jersey
New Discussion
Options

Swedish royal wedding

Re: Swedish royal wedding

  • jrgoogrljrgoogrl
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2011
    WOW!
    wedding website Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
    Report Reply
  • JulepheniaJulephenia member
    Knottie Warrior 500 Comments
    edited December 2011
    Her dress is stunning!
    Report Reply
  • misschristinecmisschristinec
    500 Comments
    edited December 2011
    HE was a personal trainer?  Looks like he should be a computer programer!  (I'm a nerdy ex-chemist btw)
    image

    FOR SALE ITEMS!

    Wedding Planning Bio

    Report Reply
  • 37 Butter Knives37 Butter Knives member
    Fourth Anniversary 500 Comments
    edited December 2011
    Once again, proof that real princesses don't wear strapless!

    (It always irked me whenever a bride goes on "Say Yes to the Dress" saying she wants to look like a "princess," then only looks at blinged-out strapless.)
    Report Reply
  • mbcdefgmbcdefg member
    10000 Comments 5 Love Its Combo Breaker
    edited December 2011
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/local-wedding-boards_new-jersey_swedish-royal-wedding?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Local%20Wedding%20BoardsForum:90Discussion:9fa1f557-7c9e-489c-b360-8cc496d8e0aePost:f21f1d4d-0590-423f-9852-302d1c4b6994">Re: Swedish royal wedding</a>:
    [QUOTE]Once again, proof that real princesses don't wear strapless! (It always irked me whenever a bride goes on "Say Yes to the Dress" saying she wants to look like a "princess," then only looks at blinged-out strapless.)
    Posted by 37 Butter Knives[/QUOTE]


    Yeah, I imagine a lot of the real princesses are under religious pressure and modesty expectations and can't wear strapless.

    I was reading that Tricia Nixon raised a lot of eyebrows when she wore a sleeveless (not even strapless) wedding dress in the 70s.
    image
    Report Reply
  • 37 Butter Knives37 Butter Knives member
    Fourth Anniversary 500 Comments
    edited December 2011
    Yeah, I agree that Victoria probably had to be a bit more covered than the average bride. But she could easily have gone for heaps of bling on her gown (or whatever over-the-top frills are the fashion these days). Instead, she went for sleek - well played, as she was wearing that ornate crown.
    Report Reply
  • Reilly626Reilly626 member
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2011
    Dress too plain and boy what an ugly geek for such a pretty girl... must have money!
    Report Reply
  • leah2bleah2b member
    500 Comments
    edited December 2011
    Love her dress
    Report Reply
  • Melissa66Melissa66
    100 Comments
    edited December 2011
    Her dress is beautiful and timeless.  Plain, elegant lines and fabric. 
    Report Reply
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards