I have always loved the way a DJ is able to guide a reception and engage a diverse group of people at weddings...but two of my friends are suggesting bands. I love the energy of a live band but I am worried that a band wont be able to please such a broad group of age ranges and will be less versatile in pleasing individual tastes throughout the night. Any thoughts?
Re: Band or DJ?
When the band takes breaks, you can use the DJ (or iPod) to play more dance-tunes or whatever your band is lacking.
In an ideal world, this is the setup we would have for our wedding but we can't afford a band. Too bad.
You should check their repetoire- its best if they do a range of covers from past yrs to present so you know they will cater for a range of tastes. Also make sure they can provide demos/videos of their live performance, as most events will be private so you wont be able to see them live. I agree with PP that having a DJ or Ipod will be necessary to play inbetween the sets and after the band finishes to provide music for the rest of the night
I love bands, but they take breaks (and they can be long).
The thing I love about djs (especially ours) is that they can still be interactive if you want them to be. You get to choose the types of music that they play (so if you don't like country - they don't have to play it). Some bands won't change their repertoire.
~Mrs.~
**Password: kls114**
Here's a quick clip of them at my friend's wedding!!! BEST RECEPTION I'VE EVER BEEN TO IN MY LIFE because of the band.
http://www.youtube.com/user/Darrylpowell2004#p/u/3/R2Ih0EXK9lM
If you're interested, I know you can reach him atq 415.685.9027
They welcome all wedding inquiries.
Thanks!