this is the code for the render ad
Kentucky

Assigned Seating

Question for those of you in Kentucky. Is assigned seating at weddings common there? I grew up there but have been gone for over 10 years and the last KY wedding I went to was probably 15 years ago. None of the ones I attended when I was younger had assigned seating. We'll have a good mix of KY and other states represented at our KY wedding (16 states represented total) so I am trying to understand the norm. I prefer NOT to do one, but wanted to see what others had experienced.

Thanks!

Re: Assigned Seating

  • edited December 2011
    To clarify, I am asking about assigned tables overall and not just the seats within the table. I was thinking of doing a bridal party table, an immediate family table, and free range for the rest.
  • FKSFKS
    100 Comments
    edited December 2011
    I've seen it done both ways and I think it's ultimately up to you and what you think your friends and family will feel more comfortable with.  We are having a pretty mixed group and we are going to do assigned tables - not seats - to save people from feeling awkward about who they are going to sit with and where.  Especially for the weddings we've gone to where we didn't know a lot of people, we were thankful for an assigned table so that we didn't have to find someone to sit with.

    I don't think you can really go wrong either way.  After dinner a lot of people get up to mingle and dance anyway, so they aren't committed to their table of people all night regardless. Just go with your gut :)
    imageWedding Countdown Ticker
  • ambi083ambi083 member
    10 Comments
    edited December 2011
    I have only been to weddings where everyone chose their own table and seat.  I don't think that as responsible adults, the guests should have an issue picking their own spot.  Also, why should I stress out about if Bobby can't sit next to Tommy cause they fought in 5th grade?  I do think that overall it is whatever the happy couple is comfortable with, though.
    Ready to get married on our 5th (dating) year anniversary!
  • inkygirlinkygirl member
    100 Comments
    edited December 2011
    I hate weddings where there aren't assigned tables.  I've also heard that you have to plan for 30% more tables and centerpieces if you don't do assigned tables because people won't fill up a table.  That's totally true.  And, remember that people who stay for pics but aren't necessarily in the bridal party (flower girl's parents, etc) will be there late and might not have a seat too.  It's more work for the bride and groom, but it's not that bad and it makes life so much easier for your guests. 
  • squirrlysquirrly member
    Knottie Warrior 5000 Comments Name Dropper 5 Love Its
    edited December 2011
    We did assigned tables and let people choose their own seats.  I really hate free-for-alls at weddings.  It never turns out well, IMO.  People who are in the front of the line stake out whole tables for groups of 5, and groups of 8 end up split into pairs, scattered across the room.
    DIY & Planning | Married 

    Married: 2010
    Mom to J: 2011
    Mom to H: 2014

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic



    Dresses may be easier to take in than let out, but guest lists are not. -- kate51485
  • edited December 2011
    I agree with assigned seats.  I've never been to a wedding that has had it.  I think it's a nice gesture to your guests to give them a table.  It makes it more personal.
  • Tuneful_BrideTuneful_Bride member
    10 Comments
    edited December 2011
    I really prefer to have seating assigned. When I can't sit with my "crew" because the table is full, I have to scout out seats for my husband and myself at some other table. I inevitably feel like an interloper, and conversation seems stilted. I think if the bride and groom have taken the time to place me at a table with the Jones and the Mackenzies, they must think that we have some common ground -- and we do!
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards