My parents want to do a combo plate for the wedding (half chicken, half beef) and FI and I want to do two separate entrees since his whole family doesn't eat beef. I also don't eat beef and wouldn't want my potato or chicken soaked in au jus. Their solution is to have people trade beef and chicken, like after dinner is served. Am I the only one who finds this odd and tacky?
Re: What do you think of this?
[QUOTE]My parents want to do a combo plate for the wedding (half chicken, half beef) and FI and I want to do two separate entrees since his whole family doesn't eat beef. I also don't eat beef and wouldn't want my potato or chicken soaked in au jus. Their solution is to have people trade beef and chicken, like after dinner is served. Am I the only one who finds this odd and tacky?
Posted by MyWedding13[/QUOTE]
<div>While the combo plate is nice for people who eat both, I think it would be pretty rude if you know that a good portion of your guests don't eat beef. Unless, as PP said, your venue is willing to give people 2 pieces of chicken if they don't want beef, or vice versa, then I wouldn't do it. And the idea of people swapping meats on a plate at the table is way too school cafeteria for me, and not something I would want at my wedding. </div>
Alyson & Phil | Planning Bio | Married Bio!
Dates & Quinces Blog
[QUOTE]That isn't something I want either. I think it is rude, also. So I wonder how this would work with the response card on the invitation? Would you just ask people if they want chicken or beef or chicken and beef?
Posted by MyWedding13[/QUOTE]
I would probably have the response card say:
__ Chicken
__ Beef
__ Chicken & Beef
(with better descriptions). However, if the majority of your guests don't eat beef, I do agree with PPs that it's probably better to skip the duet plate. It wasn't really an option for us.
There are many people who do not eat beef for personal, religious, or even medical reasons. Your parents should respect that.