this is the code for the render ad
Connecticut

Please give opinions/suggestions!!

My fiance and I are getting married summer 2011 and would like to stick to a fairly small budget. We are trying to find the most cost-effective but memorable, elegant, and special way to include as many ppl as possible.

1 idea is: have a close family only (30-50) ppl dinner at a restaurant and be married during the dinner or nearby scenic spot; then have an informal bbq at a park for many other friends and family, including ppl at restaurant ceremony. Problem is we would want alcohol for the bbq - are there any state parks that can be rented out that allow alcohol? or that allow alcohol (w/out rent out)? This is 1 reason we thought to maybe have ceremony and reception for all guests at Wickham Park - can be rented and alcohol is allowed, plus has covered space. We are thinking Wickham might be more cost effective since they provide chairs, tables, etc. THOUGHTS? Thanks!!Smile

Re: Please give opinions/suggestions!!

  • banana468banana468 member
    Knottie Warrior 25000 Comments 500 Love Its 5 Answers
    edited December 2011
    Just to clarify, you're thinking a small ceremony and reception and then after the reception, a second reception for people who weren't invited to the ceremony or dinner?

    The idea of a fun party in the park sounds great - but not in the name of your reception on your wedding day.

    I know you can bring your own alcohol to Harkness.
  • julieandjojojulieandjojo member
    100 Comments
    edited December 2011
    Thanks I will look into Harkness, and for clarification, the wedding ceremony would take place during the dinner, not really like a reception... I guess it sounds complicated. We are trying to figure out how to have about 130 ppl without being too cheap/tacky it's tough!
  • edited December 2011
    I think what banana is getting at is that to invite people to a reception (where they would be inclined to give you gifts) without inviting them to the ceremony would be poor etiquette.  The point of a wedding is your ceremony, and to not include people in that but invite them to a party where they give you gifts is looked at by some people as being money grubbing... if you know what I mean. 

    With that being said, is there a way that you can somehow include those people in your ceremony?  I don't think that I would personally be upset to just be invited to a reception if the ceremony was family only, but there definitely are people that would be upset. Is there a reason why you wouldn't want to do a ceremony at the casual large affair?  I think if you can find a park that allows alcohol so that you can have everyone would be a great idea and definitely the most inclusive situation for everyone.  Good luck!
    imageDaisypath Anniversary tickers
  • edited December 2011
    to be honest that sounds complicated im trying to understand
    so you want a private party for family and friends 30-50 people and get married during dinner and then have another party for more people.
    that sounds like 2 partys and double the cost.
    Im getting married at john j sullivans in watertown you can get married outside and go inside for the reception, they have great wedding packages..
    another good place is the hillls in watertown...
    the barbq sounds nice but i dont understand why you would want two seperate parties. you can have one big party get married in front of all your family and friends and then eat whats your budget like and for how many in total?
  • banana468banana468 member
    Knottie Warrior 25000 Comments 500 Love Its 5 Answers
    edited December 2011
    The way you're phrasing it, it sounds like you want two parties on your wedding day - which can come across as rather offensive to the guests who didn't make the cut for the ceremony list since it's so large.

    Instead, if your budget is that high, have the RD as the formal event with the casual picnic reception the day you get married.  I've seen people get married at Harkness too so somehow it can be done.
  • edited December 2011
    A friend of mine originally had planned on doing something similar to what I think you are talking about... they were going to get married on a Sat with close family (30 ppl) then on Sun have a BBQ with everyone (100+ ppl)

    In the end they had everyone together for a one day celebration. They got married at Hammenassette (sp*) on the beach, then rented a pavilion for the reception. They served beer and wine only, I do not believe alcohol was allowed. It was a nice casual wedding, everyone seemed to enjoy it. They hired Donovan's reef in Branford to provide food (burgers, hotdogs, ribs)
  • julieandjojojulieandjojo member
    100 Comments
    edited December 2011
    thanks everyone yea i think we will end up going with a one-event, one-place thing! much easier.
  • edited December 2011
    I think having two parties will end up being more expensive. I'm glad your leaning towards one ceremony and one reception. If you do it right, a casual park reception isn't tacky at all! I'd love to be a guest at one! Forget about the hoopla and celebrate what your really there for. Perfect concept if you ask me! 
    Picnik collageWedding Countdown Ticker
  • juliecderedjuliecdered member
    10 Comments
    edited December 2011
    your doing the right thing by  having 1 ceremony and 1 party. these reviews are correct about it being offensive cheap money grubbing and pooooor ettiquete (my spelling doesnt count right. my sister almost did the same thing and it was a disaster! no one really showed to either.
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards