We have decided to do a destination wedding. The package we've selected only allows 20 total. We are going to do a formal dinner reception followed by a fireworks dessert party that day. There will also be a girls night out with a covered dinner, shopping, and nails at cost of the girls who participate. We will also throw a welcome party with jack-o-lantern cutting these jack o lanterns will be used as decorations for the dessert party. Now the question of etiquette comes to play. We can only have 20 at the ceremony. We did this for cost reasons and family politics issues.When we come home we will do a Halloween potluck reception for most of our friends at the house. We will also do a reception at the holidays with my fiance's side of the family at a formal restaurant since they want to do this and I will rewear my dress. Most of them wouldn't have been able to travel anyway. Now here is the kicker we may have more than 20 interested in coming. We cant accept more than 20 to the ceremony, a larger package is out of our budget due to us opening the doors that wide we cant calculate a real head count due to the family politics. If we choose to open the reception dinner, dessert fireworks party, girls/guys night out, welcome party, and daily activities to family/friends that choose to make the trek is it rude that they cant come to the ceremony if they know in advance? We will open the ceremony only to 1st degree relatives, bridal/groom party and 1-2 close friends. If certain people decline and we are not over the 20 we may allow those who come to join for the ceremony an all or nothing deal that would be decided prior to the actual trip. I know A and B lists are rude, but we have people right now saying no ceremony is fine they may come down for the rest, is this rude? Or is this ok because we acknowledge these numbers to start?
Edited to add: We were originally looking to do a larger destination package or larger wedding. We also wont have final dates, etc till February. We want to address etiquette issues now rather than later.
