Hello lovely Knotties,
I'm at the very start of my wedding planning journey (my goodness, such fun! And so many sums!) and I have a question about wearing two different dresses for different portions of the day. At the moment our plan is to have a ceremony at a rather grand church in central London - huge aisle, organ, historic building and our reception in some fields that belong to my school - marquee, country-style, fun and dancing. These two aspects really reflect us well as a couple and cover the solemnity we want as part of our wedding and the fun we love to have with friends.
However, these two different aspects to me seem like two differnt occasions, dress wise. So I'm thinking of doing two dresses (a la Kate Middleton!) - a big ballgown style dress for the wedding itself, the receiving line, the speeches etc; then a lighter, simpler dress for dancing, drinks and fun. Add in the fact that we are getting married in a London August and I think a cooler dress might be nice for our outdoor-ish receptiuon.
What are your thoughts? Thank you in advance for your input - I'll be quizzing all ,my bridesmaids too but some objective viewpoints would be lovely!
Re: Two dresses?
I'm doing the same thing you are for almost the same reasons. I'm planning my dancing dress to be the same dress as the one I wear to the rehearsal, basically because I don't have unlimited $$$. I'm changing into it after dinner and cake/the cake cutting, which preceeds our dancing. I think wearing a huge ballgown dress with a 7-hoop (yes, crazy!) petticoat from 3:30-10:00 PM is plent-ty.
I would suggest you buy two garment bags, so that at the venue or whenever you change, your wedding dress is very safe. Those bags do sometimes rip. Sounds like you will have an amazing wedding! Congratulations!
I removed the veil for our more casual reception.
It worked out great.
[QUOTE]I'm sorry; I just can't get behind spending money on a ballgown to only wear for a few hours. There are a few convertible dresses out there where you can remove the skirt and have a short dress underneath. Maybe you might consider one of them?
Posted by artbyallie[/QUOTE]
<div>I agree with this. Have you looked at convertible dress options? You can remove the skirt and your veil and you're ready to party!</div>
[QUOTE]I would suggest a simpler gown, but add an elaborate cathedral veil for your church ceremony. I removed the veil for our more casual reception. It worked out great.
Posted by itzMS[/QUOTE]
I really like this idea.
OP, you don't have to have a ballgown. There are many dresses out there that would be appropriate for your ceremony reception. And adding an elaborate cathedral length veil will always make a grand statement.
i feel that it is a waste of money to be spending so much money on a dress you will only wear once, unless you have plans to convert into something else after (that seems like a popular thing to do).
A previous person said to look into a convertible dress-that is a very good idea.
Or you can look for one dress that satisfies both the ceremony and reception.
I had a more formal one, and then had a short party dress that was similar style and color to my "big dress". I wouldn't spend a great deal of money getting a second dress, but if there's a dress you love that fits into your wedding (and budget allows) and has potential to wear it again, DO IT! I loved that I had the option to change if it got too hot or if my big dress got too heavy.
This was my wedding dress: http://algenina.blogspot.ca/2012/06/hitched-few-more-wedding-pictures.html
The second dress was my reception dress that I didn't end up wearing, but still wore at other events: http://algenina.blogspot.ca/2012/03/girls-in-white-dresses.html
May 2012 July Siggy: Favorite Vacation Spot Kaleden, BC
My Blog:Through My Eyes