Wedding Woes

I bet this woman kicks puppies.

Dear Prudie,
During my six-year marriage to an amazing man, I have had a cordial relationship with his mother. I am now pregnant with his family’s first grandchild. My husband and I mutually decided that we didn’t want to know the sex before the birth. My mother-in-law was livid with our decision, even though I tried to placate her by using the obstetrician she suggested and allowing her to attend some of my prenatal appointments. She continued to bring up gender at every opportunity. My doctor’s staff was aware of our decision not to know the baby’s sex, but after one sonogram I was surprised to see my mother-in-law at the office smiling ear to ear. A few days later I had messages from family members congratulating me on the baby girl I was having! My mother-in-law wheedled the information out of the ultrasound technician, who is a friend of hers, then announced it. I threatened the clinic with legal action and found a new doctor mid-pregnancy. My mother-in-law is smug about her tactics and told me nastily that if I “still had a mother,” I wouldn't be so selfish. (I was orphaned at age 14.) I can't express how betrayed and hurt I am by this. My husband sides with me and we’ve made a birthing plan that includes her not being permitted in the facility until we’ve been released. We will not inform anyone of the birth until after we're home, and for the time being, she won't be welcome to visit. Am I being too vengeful here? How do I overcome this feeling of betrayal?

—Sad Mommy

Re: I bet this woman kicks puppies.

  • I totally saw this coming once she said she decided to use the OB her MIL suggested.
  • 6fsn6fsn member
    Knottie Warrior 10000 Comments 500 Love Its Name Dropper
    No NO NO
  • GBCKGBCK member
    Knottie Warrior 5000 Comments 500 Love Its Name Dropper
    I think I'd cut off MIL altogether.  I don't have tolerance for that level of BS.
  • I don't think the OP is taking things far enough. I have to question her choice to use the OB recommended by MIL (given some of the history), but that's doesn't in any way justify the unapproved release of patient information or the MIL's actions. 

    My ILs were disappointed that we chose to wait to find out Wolverine's sex, but they got over it. oSIL (the one I don't particularly like) threatened to bust in on my sonograms, but it was in jest. 
  • tawillerstawillers member
    Ninth Anniversary 5000 Comments 500 Love Its Name Dropper
    edited April 2014
    THIS is what happens when you just want to make everyone happy, even if it's not what you want.
  • I would demand that DH tell his mother she's cut off from our lives and the child's life, forever, no exceptions, no excuses, no apologies

    You KNOW that if this happens, she will sue for visitation, at minimum.
    imageAlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers
  • GBCKGBCK member
    Knottie Warrior 5000 Comments 500 Love Its Name Dropper
    yeah, but grandparent's rights, generally speaking, are only extended if the child has an existing relationship w/ the grandparent--so actually, that makes NOW--before the kid is here, the right time to cut her off.
  • I would demand that DH tell his mother she's cut off from our lives and the child's life, forever, no exceptions, no excuses, no apologies
    You KNOW that if this happens, she will sue for visitation, at minimum.
    I am pretty sure grandparents have no legal recourse...so she can try....
    Anniversary
    image
  • For the technician to release information to anyone other than the patient (mom to be) was just wrong and illegal.  I would go forward with charging her and the clinic.  I would also want to cut that terrible woman out of my life and my family's life.  
    image
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards