this is the code for the render ad
Wedding Woes

There's ways to tell Sam and Sue to knock it off, right?

Dear Prudence,
I work at a company that often pairs employees from different departments together in a one-on-one capacity. These partnerships often involve spending a great deal of time together. I manage many of these partners. One of these newest team members, “Sue,” is an attractive, young, married woman. Her work partner, “Sam,” is also young and attractive—but single. Recently Sue’s husband has been out of town and she and Sam have been spending a lot of time outside of work together. Normally that’s not a big deal; however, Sam recently mentioned that Sue had spent the night at his house. He was emphatic that it was on the couch but as there was no drinking involved and Sue only lives 10 minutes from him, I found this odd.

Our employee handbook is very clear about romantic relationships being forbidden among staff and since we’re a faith-based company (although I’m hardly zealous), I know how this could be perceived very badly. Normally I would never know about something like this but Sam has become a friend and shared the information. My first thought is that I felt like I needed to have a gentle conversation of caution with Sue as my employee. If she were single I would feel less anxious, but still worried that if a relationship were to start and end there would be serious awkwardness for their partnership (they are in a remote territory and can’t be reassigned). I’m trying to ignore the red flags in her marriage, because I know that is not my business, but is the seemingly budding relationship also something I have to stay out of? As her supervisor, do I let adults be adults, or do I discuss this with her?

—Happy Work Wife, Happy Life?

Re: There's ways to tell Sam and Sue to knock it off, right?

  • I would stay way the hell out of it.
  • Why should LW go and talk to Sue?  It takes two to do whatever it is they are doing, which LW doesn't even know for sure what it is. 

    If anything, I would remind Sam that as a faith based company, they have a morals clause and forbidden from work place romances.  I'd say that you are not going to say anything about this to anyone but him, but that even in a remote rural location, other people may find out.

  • I think she should drive to the remote location and spy on them, through the windows and shit.  Then when she catches them in the act, she should lecture them on the responsibilities of reflecting your faith while completely ignoring the fact that she's judging another persons marriage and has been contemplating sticking her nose in other peoples business.
    image
  • Why should LW go and talk to Sue?  It takes two to do whatever it is they are doing, which LW doesn't even know for sure what it is. 

    If anything, I would remind Sam that as a faith based company, they have a morals clause and forbidden from work place romances.  I'd say that you are not going to say anything about this to anyone but him, but that even in a remote rural location, other people may find out.

    I think the reason LW thought he/she should talk with Sue is because Sue is LW's employee while Sam is under someone else's authority. I can see why LW would think about speaking to Sue about it being against company policy to have workplace relationships in that case.
  • Why should LW go and talk to Sue?  It takes two to do whatever it is they are doing, which LW doesn't even know for sure what it is. 

    If anything, I would remind Sam that as a faith based company, they have a morals clause and forbidden from work place romances.  I'd say that you are not going to say anything about this to anyone but him, but that even in a remote rural location, other people may find out.

    I think the reason LW thought he/she should talk with Sue is because Sue is LW's employee while Sam is under someone else's authority. I can see why LW would think about speaking to Sue about it being against company policy to have workplace relationships in that case.
    Except she has no evidence there is anything inappropriate taking place. Coworker 1 spent the night on coworker 2's couch. They get along and work well together. 

    In what universe is that evidence of an inappropriate workplace relationship? Even though LW says she isn't zealous, she sure is looking for a reason to implement these relationship standards. 
  • Why should LW go and talk to Sue?  It takes two to do whatever it is they are doing, which LW doesn't even know for sure what it is. 

    If anything, I would remind Sam that as a faith based company, they have a morals clause and forbidden from work place romances.  I'd say that you are not going to say anything about this to anyone but him, but that even in a remote rural location, other people may find out.

    I think the reason LW thought he/she should talk with Sue is because Sue is LW's employee while Sam is under someone else's authority. I can see why LW would think about speaking to Sue about it being against company policy to have workplace relationships in that case.
    Except she has no evidence there is anything inappropriate taking place. Coworker 1 spent the night on coworker 2's couch. They get along and work well together. 

    In what universe is that evidence of an inappropriate workplace relationship? Even though LW says she isn't zealous, she sure is looking for a reason to implement these relationship standards. 
    I agree. I was just pointing out why she might have a reason to talk to Sue and not Sam.
  • I wouldn't say anything unless I knew there was something definitely going on. 

    That said, I do not buy she slept on the couch when she only lives 10 minutes away, her husband is gone and they were not drinking.   

    As a manager the LW is responsible to uphold the policies of the company. I can see why the LW is concerned.






    What differentiates an average host and a great host is anticipating unexpressed needs and wants of their guests.  Just because the want/need is not expressed, doesn't mean it wouldn't be appreciated. 
  • Why should LW go and talk to Sue?  It takes two to do whatever it is they are doing, which LW doesn't even know for sure what it is. 

    If anything, I would remind Sam that as a faith based company, they have a morals clause and forbidden from work place romances.  I'd say that you are not going to say anything about this to anyone but him, but that even in a remote rural location, other people may find out.

    I think the reason LW thought he/she should talk with Sue is because Sue is LW's employee while Sam is under someone else's authority. I can see why LW would think about speaking to Sue about it being against company policy to have workplace relationships in that case.
    Except she has no evidence there is anything inappropriate taking place. Coworker 1 spent the night on coworker 2's couch. They get along and work well together. 

    In what universe is that evidence of an inappropriate workplace relationship? Even though LW says she isn't zealous, she sure is looking for a reason to implement these relationship standards. 
    I get more of an impression that LW doesn't want to lose Sue and has a friendly relationship with Sam and doesn't want him in trouble either.   In this instance, since Sam is the one flapping his mouth, she needs to tell him to STFU and that he and Sue need to keep the professionalism at 100.  I really don't think she wants to even know about this, but since Sam brought it up, it puts her in an odd position.  
  • mrsconn23 said:

    Why should LW go and talk to Sue?  It takes two to do whatever it is they are doing, which LW doesn't even know for sure what it is. 

    If anything, I would remind Sam that as a faith based company, they have a morals clause and forbidden from work place romances.  I'd say that you are not going to say anything about this to anyone but him, but that even in a remote rural location, other people may find out.

    I think the reason LW thought he/she should talk with Sue is because Sue is LW's employee while Sam is under someone else's authority. I can see why LW would think about speaking to Sue about it being against company policy to have workplace relationships in that case.
    Except she has no evidence there is anything inappropriate taking place. Coworker 1 spent the night on coworker 2's couch. They get along and work well together. 

    In what universe is that evidence of an inappropriate workplace relationship? Even though LW says she isn't zealous, she sure is looking for a reason to implement these relationship standards. 
    I get more of an impression that LW doesn't want to lose Sue and has a friendly relationship with Sam and doesn't want him in trouble either.   In this instance, since Sam is the one flapping his mouth, she needs to tell him to STFU and that he and Sue need to keep the professionalism at 100.  I really don't think she wants to even know about this, but since Sam brought it up, it puts her in an odd position.  
    I agree, I just think LW is inferring a lot from sleeping on the couch. And Sam definitely needs to stop with the over sharing. 
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards