Wedding Etiquette Forum

What Time to List on Wedding Invite?

Hi All-

My ceremony and reception are at one venue. The ceremony starts at 4:30pm, and I know traditionally you list the start time on the invite but I am wondering if it is appropriate to list 4pm instead? I am worried if I list 4:30pm people will show up right at 4:30pm, however if I list 4pm, it will give more of a buffer for people to park, get seated etc. 

You would think either way, guests would arrive early but I live in Southern California and people are always running late lol. What's the etiquette for this? I have also seen it done where on the "details" card there is a note to be seated by 4:30pm or arrival 4pm, ceremony start 4:30pm, reception to follow. 

Thoughts?

Re: What Time to List on Wedding Invite?

  • The time the ceremony begins. 
  • Do these people not attend other things with fixed start times?  If a baseball game is scheduled for 4:00 would they show up at 5:00 and think it's OK?   Would they show up for a play and be surprised if the 2nd act was in process? 

    Put the time the ceremony starts on the invitation.   If people are late, it sucks for them.   
  • The etiquette is to list the time the ceremony begins, so 4:30 in your case. 

    Here's the reason it's against etiquette to write an earlier time: by listing an earlier time, you are trying to accommodate the chronically late/rude people by punishing the polite people who will be there early/on time. The polite people are going to get there at 3:45 and have to wait a full 45 minutes for the ceremony to begin. Not ok. Late people are going to be late no matter what and you shouldn't punish polite people to accommodate them. You'll be facing forward and ignoring them anyway.
    *********************************************************************************

    image

  • levioosa said:

    Um, I'm from Southern California and "being habitually late" is not a thing unless it is culturally related. Please don't continue a negative stereotype of Southern Californians being lazy and late. 

    If a ceremony start time is listed as 4:30 my butt will be in that seat at 4:10 or 4:15. A start time is a start time. I will have probably arrived to the venue at 3:45 or 4 to park, use the restroom and find my seat. People who run late shouldn't be accommodated. They have all the info they need to make it on time. If they can't budget their time appropriately, that's on them. Your other guests who arrived on time shouldn't pay the price. 


    Agreed x1,000.  Although I don't live there now, I grew up in So. CA and both my wedding and my sister's wedding were there.  We both had the REAL ceremony time on our invites.  Each ceremony started on time and guests were there and seated.  My sister had 75 guests at her wedding.  All of whom seemed to make it on time just fine.  I had 35 guests at my wedding.  One of my guests was late.  The other 34 were there.  The late guest stood unobtrusively over to the side until the ceremony was over.

    Like the other PPs have pointed out.  If guests are late, that's on THEM.  Do not punish the people who arrived on time.

    In addition, I've lived in three very different places in this country.  I've never had the impression that people in So. CA are "habitually late" as compared to anywhere else.  I think that is more on an individual basis than on a regional basis.

    However, if you feel your friends/family group tend to be "late comers", casually mention to the chattiest people that your wedding will be at 4:30 SHARP.  That you're excited to walk down that aisle and you don't care who isn't there yet.   

    Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • H and I are very different. H (and his family) are late to everything and me (and my family) are the first people to show up. He thinks weddings always start late and the time listed is more of a guideline. Most that we've been part of do start late, but I was bound and determined to start mine on time which was what I listed on the invite.

    We started right on time and had probably 10 people show up late. They are always the same late people. We didn't put an earlier time because that would be punishing the on time people.

  • Our ceremony was almost late because my DHs grandmother hadn't shown up yet.  The DOC came up to me 5 minutes before we were to walk and I just shrugged and said, not my problem if she's late but DH wanted to wait.  She ended up walking to her seat 1 minute before the processional started.  I think about 10-15 guests were late/missed the ceremony.  I have noticed that these relatives are now extra early to other events so maybe they learned we won't wait for them.

  • Slight thread jack... how "on time" do I have to be?  My wedding will take place at my reception location.  There will not be a procession or an aisle.  Basically, me, my groom, and our officiant will stand up in the middle of the reception space with all our guest seated at their tables (or standing around us if they feel too far away), and we'll have a ceremony.  I would hope people will grab drinks as they arrive and will have a drink in their hand during the ceremony.  If I say we're starting at 1pm, do we have to be standing in the middle of the room talking by 1:01?  Or do I get a five minute "gap" to make up for the lack of procession?
  • @adk19 Will there be some musical cue that the ceremony's about to start? Or perhaps the officiant will make an announcement to call everyone's attention? I would have that happen at 1:00.
  • You had to take a train to get to my ceremony site. Once the train left the station, you couldn't get another one since they shut it off during the ceremony. I put the ceremony time on the invitations and the website stated, "The train will depart the station at 5pm." I had 3 people only able to catch the train because it stopped to pick up the WP. You can't dictate other people's time, unfortunately, and as a pp said, if your wedding starts 30 minutes after you've said it will, I'm going to think someone is running.

  • MobKaz said:



    adk19 said:


    Slight thread jack... how "on time" do I have to be?  My wedding will take place at my reception location.  There will not be a procession or an aisle.  Basically, me, my groom, and our officiant will stand up in the middle of the reception space with all our guest seated at their tables (or standing around us if they feel too far away), and we'll have a ceremony.  I would hope people will grab drinks as they arrive and will have a drink in their hand during the ceremony.  If I say we're starting at 1pm, do we have to be standing in the middle of the room talking by 1:01?  Or do I get a five minute "gap" to make up for the lack of procession?




    My interpretation would be that at 1:00, some type of prelude music would begin to indicate to any non-seated guests that the ceremony is beginning.  I would allow that musical "window" , if you will,  to afford guests the time needed to finish having their drink order filled and find a seat.  That would give you your 5 minutes.  I would not perceive that as a late start or gap.


    Crap.  Now I have to think about music.  How about having loud-ish music playing as people walk in (but quiet enough to talk), then the queue can be the music turning OFF for the ceremony to start?
  • CMGragainCMGragain member
    10000 Comments 500 Love Its Fourth Anniversary 25 Answers
    edited April 2017
    I am a retired church organist, and I have played at more than 100 weddings.  I always played for about twenty minutes while the guests were being seated.  I was prepared to pad that by about ten minutes.  When I saw the pastor and the groomsmen lined up at the front of the church, I knew it was my signal to end the prelude and to play whatever processional music the couple had chosen.

    Only twice was there a significant delay, both due to poor planning.  I had to stop playing and rest after an hour.  Once I actually fell because my feet were numb.  It was very embarrassing for everyone, but I really couldn't continue without a break.  (You try perching on a wooden bench with your arms and legs moving for more than an hour!)   My contract stated that there was a penalty for late weddings, and those two times, I enforced it!  I would much rather have done the wedding as scheduled.

    It is extremely rude to delay the start of your wedding to wait for extra guests who do not have the common courtesy to come on time.  Do not do this.  Your guests will remember and wonder why you didn't care about starting on time.
    httpiimgurcomTCCjW0wjpg

  • CMGragain said:

    I am a retired church organist, and I have played at more than 100 weddings.  I always played for about twenty minutes while the guests were being seated.  I was prepared to pad that by about ten minutes.  When I saw the pastor and the groomsmen lined up at the front of the church, I knew it was my signal to end the prelude and to play whatever processional music the couple had chosen.

    Only twice was there a significant delay, both due to poor planning.  I had to stop playing and rest after an hour.  Once I actually fell because my feet were numb.  It was very embarrassing for everyone, but I really couldn't continue without a break.  (You try perching on a wooden bench with your arms and legs moving for more than an hour!)   My contract stated that there was a penalty for late weddings, and those two times, I enforced it!  I would much rather have done the wedding as scheduled.

    It is extremely rude to delay the start of your wedding to wait for extra guests who do not have the common courtesy to come on time.  Do not do this.  Your guests will remember and wonder why you didn't care about starting on time.


    I mean, presumably the organist would be told the ceremony start time, not the "arrival" time, and would only be playing their normal amount of time.

    But yes, having two separate times is still a very rude gesture to everyone who actually knows how to get places on time.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards