Photos and Video
In the wedding realm, is this a too "cheap" photog?
Hi! I'm struggling to decide between two photographers -- one team costs ~$2,000 for 7 hours (local) and another costs $3,200 (which includes travel and hotel accommodations as they're out of town). Should I be nervous that option A is significantly cheaper? Should I splurge for the more expensive one? They're almost the same in quality, but the more expensive team has a fashion background and that shows in the photos. However, I'm on a budget and also only having a somewhat low-key, 30-guest wedding -- so do I NEED that high caliber a photographer?