Hi all,
The too-long-didn't-read question of this entire post is whether chicken ought to be one of three options on our dinner menu. Read on for all of the details.
I'm jumping the gun here a bit--my wedding isn't until the summer of 2015 but I have selected a venue and the menu (along with many other goodies!) is on its way in the mail. It's winter break for me so I have nothing better to do than to start seriously planning this wedding while I still have some free time.
For dinner, we are to select 3 options (from a list of 70!) that will be served in addition to the vegetarian, vegan, gluten free, and kosher options. Due to the amount of options, there is no tasting but this company is known for having some of the best wedding food in our area.
We know that for one of our options, we will select one of the many filet mignon dishes (they have different sauces and preparations). Our second option will likely be a seafood dish. We are going to stay away from shellfish because more people tend to be allergic and we will also have a ton of shellfish at our cocktail hour, anyway.
For our final option, I'm a bit torn. I know people traditionally serve chicken. I was thinking of doing something maybe a little more exciting. They have a duck breast in a Grand Marnier sauce that looks amazing. They also do a rack of lamb in a blueberry demi-glaze, but I thought the lamb might be too heavy because we are also serving steak. There are plenty of other options.
Is chicken served traditionally because it is popular or because of the price? The price per head that we are charged does not change with the dishes we serve, so I thought it might be nice to serve the best of the best! I just don't know what guests like or expect. This is really one of the first big events I've ever thrown.
Any feedback is appreciated! I don't know the etiquette rules on this one.