I've been researching honeymoon options lately, really looking into Sandals resorts. I've heard great things about them, they're in our price range, and they offer a military discount. I finally narrowed it down to St. Lucia (though not sure which of the three resorts there yet).
But this morning FI was talking to his dad--his parents go on a lot of vacations together--and his dad recommended that we go to a Riu resort instead. He said you get much more for your money than going to a Sandals resort but didn't explain what he meant or tell us how much they paid when they went to a Riu place in Mexico. (We aren't interested in going to Mexico.) I started looking at their website and see they don't have any hotels in St. Lucia (bummer) but we wouldn't mind Ochos Rios or somewhere else in Jamaica. Just from a little bit of research I don't really see how it's a better deal than Sandals...it seems to me like they have less to do. For example, I looked at the Riu in St. Martin and only breakfast was included, not lunch or dinner.
Has anyone been to a Riu place and can tell me what it's like? Is it comparable to Sandals, or better?
Re: Riu vs. Sandals
If you really like St. Lucia, I would stick to your gut (as long as you are paying- he who pays gets a say!) and maybe look at all of your options on the island. St. Lucia has some great non-AI luxury resorts, some AI luxury resorts that are more intimate and more boutique, and they have some resorts that are non-AI but you can add on meal and drink plans!
Never been to Sandals so can't compare that.
Sandals truly is the most all inclusive with a ton of activities, bars and pools a strict no tipping policy as it is worked into the room price ( this means,you don't have to worry about how much extra to bring).
Depending on what room level you pick there are even more added amenities (we won't go less than club level*tend to have a better location/view and butler just isn't our style) such as mini bar in room, bathrobes, separate check in in the club lounge and room service* each resort is different on full menu or limited menu* .
From what I have seen of the basic rooms at each of the resorts that we have been to, they are identical to all other rooms just different location and no added amenities. At the four we have been to, it also does not matter what room level you are, you are not treated any differently by staff as they treat everyone equally and with respect (as long as you do the same to them).
I have a link to my website above my siggy pic if you would like to check it out (reviews and a crap ton of pics). If you have any question please feel free to PM me.
I've been to Riu Ocho Rios, and it was fine. I've also been to Sandals La Toc in St. Lucia and it was nice. I stayed in the base model room at both, and they were similar. However, Sandals had better food options, better upgraded room options, and probably most importantly for your honeymoon, NO CHILDREN. Riu is not adult-only. There were a lot of families there when we went (over Christmas about 5 years ago).
In my opinion, St. Lucia is just a prettier island than Jamaica. i like the mountains and rain forest and all of that. It reminded me of Kauai but much closer (i'm on the east coast). But that's a matter of opinion. In your position, i'd probably do either Sandals La Toc or Grande in St. Lucia, provided that it was in the budget. I think both Riu and Sandals in Jamaica (Ocho Rios) would probably be less expensive than St. Lucia as a second option. But i have heard that Sandals White House in Jamaica is really awesome (though expensive).
We travel A LOT. There are many resorts that are just as nice as Sandals without the enormous price tag. IMO they are so over rated.
Secrets and Excellence resorts are better values imo.
Rius are nice and have a good rep but not on same level.
If you are set on st lucia please look at stonefield villa estates and ti kaye
Spring Break 2013