Hello all,
My wedding is coming up fast (May 16th - eek) and my latest project is working on a seating chart. Originally I had planned to do table names, instead of using numbers, to better go with my particular theme. However, I attended a wedding last night and it made me realize that without table numbers going in ascending/descending order based on placement, it might be hard for guests to find their tables. I don't want to make my guests wander around the reception space searching for their table. For anyone who has used tables names in the past, do you feel like it was hard for guests to find their table? Any ideas on how to make this idea more guest-friendly?
Thanks!
Re: Using table names instead of table numbers?
Also, I've been to weddings that had numbers but weren't even in order. It was so confusing. I was at table 12 and tables 2 and 15 were next to me. Wtf?
Your FFIL actually expects your bridal party to escort every single one of your guests to their seats? This is not only not traditional, but it will take all of your reception! When the hell are your guests who are still waiting to be "escorted" to their seats supposed to actually get to eat, dance, etc., especially the very last ones to be escorted to their seats, hours after the reception starts?
Are the guests just supposed to stand up the whole time while waiting to be escorted to their seats? Has your FFIL, or you, given a thought to the fact that nobody wants to stand up for hours, let alone waiting to be seated, especially people who need to eat or have physical issues that preclude standing for prolonged periods, or even just wearing high heels, and that your bridal party isn't going to want to escort the guests to their seats? They're not going to give a fuck about the centerpieces, unique or not.