Facing a bit of a conundrum with my FMIL in regards to our caterer. My FI and I are on a crazy tight budget and DIYing most of our wedding. One of the only things we'd like to quasi-splurge on is the food. We both LOVE Indian food. The only other thing in our budget is horridly boring chicken and meatloaf type food so shahi paneer is looking great. We have a very diverse, international group of friends (we're both anthropologists), so most of our guests would appreciate it too. Yet when we mentioned the idea in passing to the FMIL, she had a meltdown of horror. "Oh god! No one will eat that! You can't do that to your guests!" I swear she was near tears. This woman thinks the only spices worth consuming are salt and pepper, and she's not entirely sure of the pepper. She has the palate of a pathologically picky 5-year-old. On the other hand, most or all of our friends and family are very adventurous eaters. Should we really cater to the lowest common denominator on the taste scale? Also, we are (so far) paying for everything. They claim that they are going to help out, but haven't suggested an amount or offered to pay for anything in particular except a dessert table that we don't want or need (she also told us not to invite any children because they'll eat all the cookies...). We have every intention of serving some not-too-spicy dishes for the food-timid crowd. Is this really so unreasonable?