Hi all!
Right now, my fiance and I have an overall 30k budget, with $3,000 going toward a photographer and a videographer. I'm really hoping to get nice pictures and need someone to cover the day (starting with getting ready around noon, reception lasting until 10ish). It'd be great if we could get two photogs as well. Is it realistic to get that for $1500-2000? I just want to get an idea before starting research, to cut out the frustration we had when venue hunting.
Re: Is our photography budget realistic?
I know for my area, that would be realistic, but you need to look at the whole package. For that price does that cover just the taking photos portion or does that include any prints, because you are going to want prints, even if you go to Walgreens (which actually does a great job printing). In all reality, you don't need your photographer to stay until the end of the reception. By the end of the reception most guests will have left or you risk some photos of a few very drunk guests. Have photographer do first half of reception & make sure to get all the key things like dances, toasts & etc done during that time frame. Also if you need to make room in budget for photography, skill the getting ready photos or reduce it to when you are getting your dress on. When you think about it, do you really need the memory of what you looked like with your hair getting done & half your makeup done? It's probably more the memories of you and your girls being together & a good photographer can get those after you are all dressed. And make sure you really check their portfolio to see how photos are edited. Not all photographers have the software to do better editing. Also make sure to have it in your contract how long it will be before you get your photos. Many weekend photographers despite being good photographers can take months to get photos back because they are juggling their regular jobs, their families and doing your photos along with taking photos for others. A full time photographer can get your photos back to as soon as 1-2 weeks.
2 of my friends hired cheap photographers ($2500 and less) and hated their pics. But they both had videographers, so pics weren't important to them.
I totally agree that a photog isn't necessary for the ENTIRE wedding; I hired a really good photog for just ceremony and post-ceremony portraits at my first wedding. $450 for 1 hour well spent.
Would you be willing to only have a photographer for the ceremony? Or willing to hire a friend to take pics? If not, I would be wary about hiring a professional under $3k UNLESS it's a new photographer with good equipment. Compare the pics of a $3k photographer to one charging $4k or more; there's often a significant difference in quality. But that difference may not matter to you. Photographers are very willing to negotiate- so if one starts at $4k, ask about cutting down number of photographers or amount of time.
If I could do it over again, at a budget, I'd probably hire just hire my videographer at $4500. He provided still pics from video that were amazing! He's new to weddings, but has won an Emmy and Icon award already - check this out:
https://player.vimeo.com/video/131150494
We were willing to pay $6k for the photographer I wanted...but that left little room for a wedding video that I really also had my heart set on. my girlfriend used weddingmix videos for her wedding last march – its a free app that collects everyone’s photos and videos then editors create a full wedding video from the scences you like best.
I'm pretty sure I'm going to use them too because it's so much more affordable than hiring a professional videographer, plus I like the idea of seeing a ton of wedding moments through my guests eyes
I saw on FB about their summer promotion that gives a free short edited wedding video made from all the photos and videos: http://www.storymixmedia.com/weddingmix/weddingmix-lite/
BUT they also have packages that offer camera rental and longer videos (that's what my girlfriend got and she was super happy with her vid)
I had a friend use a "family friend just starting out" in photography. She spent far less than I am...but she never ordered a single picture because they turned out terrible. The photographer had no idea what she was doing.
Of course, like others have said, it depends how important photos are to you. They are very important to me, and I've heard from multiple people that that's the one thing they wouldn't want to skimp on because your photos are most of your physical, tangible memories from that day.
It is possible!!! Good luck!