Photographer Count

JJC4lyf3

Morning Ladies,

I am about to sign my contract with my photographer and he gave me the option to add a second photographer for $250. (My package without the second is already $968 to include bridal session)

So I was wondering if a second photographer is needed for the extra cost?

FYI: I am having my ceremony and reception in the same location with about 100 attendees including the groom and myself.

loop0406

Are you also having videographer ?  If not, I think $250 for 2nd photographer is reasonable. If you are having videographer too, I would leave as is, I wouldn't want 3 people running around after me.

MdniteMustang00

that's SO reasonable. 2nd photogs are so helpful.

tyboyd

My photographer is less expensive than that WITH 2 photographers. lol. But to answer your question, that's a reasonable price. And 2 photographers is always better than 1.

mtsookasem

I think that is VERY reasonable, and the reason to have 2 is so you don't miss anything! For example, if 1 photographer takes you and your husband for some photos, the other one can stay and take pictures of the reception. Make sense?

[Deleted User]

I'm going to go with yes. Especially for the ceremony

cvgomez23

Yes, that is a reasonable price, and you can't go wrong with having an extra photographer...

caswedding

Very reasonable!

JJC4lyf3

Thank ladies, butthe FI said NO....guess one will do.  I will just have to make sure the guest bring their cameras

Eboix518

If you can change his mind I would get the 2nd photog - your only get that day once