So, after booking our photographer--deposit and everything--she told me that with the timeline we have it would be difficult to get some of the "posed" shots that I suggested. Well, having a second shooter is definetely out of our budget ($225) but I just wanted to see what everyone else thought. We hired her for 6 hours-- I just wanted pictures of me getting into the dress, no makeup/hair pictures, and some of my FI putting his jacket on and things of that nature. Here is our timeline:
She will be there from 4-10pm. (Reception starts at 8--is 10 too late to have her there until? is my FIRST question)
4:00- Be at the bridal suite at the reception site getting into my dress.
5:00-5:15 (bound to run late...I think it runs in my family's blood!) Ceremony will be 15 minutes so anywhere from 5-5:30
5:30-6:00- Guests get their placecards, mingle, sign our guestbook WHILE we are taking pictures.
6-7:00- Cocktail hour (Guests are not allowed into the reception room until 6pm.) still WHILE we are taking pictures.
7-8:00- Intro's and Dinner
8-12:00- Reception.
So, what I don't understand, and maybe it's because I am not a photographer, is isn't 1.5 hours plenty of time to get pictures taken? We are planning on doing our family/formal pictures before the ceremony but we are NOT doing a first look. I don't want to say anything bad about our photographer but is she just trying to get more money from me or something? We already went over burget by using her.
WHAT TO DO?!