I am having trouble picking between 2 dresses. I love them both and my budget loves them both too. My fiance decided on having Victorian and Rustic (farm) undertones in the wedding and I would like my dress to partially reflect these (no lace though). We cannot afford the extravagance of a full Victorian theme and I despise the idea of ruffles and non-clean lines (I've read up on Victorian attire and am not aiming for royal dress - my family was a common Scottish family so we're looking at nonelaborate undertones that a wealthy commoner would have). The dress would have navy colourings and will be ivory (I'm pale and nearly glow in the dark). My fiance has requested I wear a strapless dress. I'm very small (5'-1" with a tiny frame) so the more traditional ballroom gowns will wear me and will not fit with the Rustic theme. My fiance and I are having the ceremony on his grandparents farm and I am far from a fancy girl.
The first dress: Alfred Angelo 1797 - has navy embroidery and sweep train

The second dress: Alfred Angelo 1612 - no navy embroidery and semi-cathedral train