I'm still in the way early stages of planning and have been checking out photographers' websites to see the different styles and options that are available. I was pretty shocked to see one site with a woman donning only a tie under the "bridal" section.
Then, another site I'm on had a thread about this kind of shoot. One of the women offered up her pictures; I was, again, kinda taken aback. She's gorgeous, don't get me wrong, but I was a little shocked. So I Googled it. Apparently, this is a new trend with most women reserving the photos for their FH only. It's supposed to have a cutesy-sexy pin-up vibe, but most of the photos I've seen drop cutesy and go full force for sexy.
I'm not typically conservative and I'm pretty sure my FH would love a boudoir album... but I'm really on the fence about this one. What do you think about boudoir photos? Are you doing it? And if you are, are you reserving them strictly for your FH or are you going to show them to other people?
Re: Boudoir Photos - Classy or Trashy?
Still, showing them to anyone other than FI makes them trashy, to me
I think it gets trashy when it's raunchy shoot, or it's something that the groom really wouldn't be into (I think DH would love it, but I know one of his good friends would be really p!ssed if his wife did a shoot) ... or you're one of those creepy people that like frame one of the pictures and place it where people can actually see it in your house (Which yes, they do exist).
If I ever were to do I shoot (I've been debating as an anniversary gift for DH), I would make sure that everything was subtle ... like properly draped sheets and whatnot. That would be a perfect balance of what he'd find sexy and my comfort level.
If you fire a WP member, you're against America.
"Meg cracks me up on the regular. Now she gets to do it in two different forums. Yay!!" ~mkrupar
"So I sing a song of love, Julia"
06.10.10
BFAR:We Defined Our Own Success!
But I still think this "trend" is more trashy that cute (and in no way "classy"). Sorry, ladies. He is (or will be) your HUSBAND - and the best gift you can come up with are professional "pin-up" style pictures of yourself?
My FI and I chose the package from our photographer to include boudoir photos. Our photographer is willing to look at examples to get an idea of what we want, and he shoots with his assistant (who happens to be his wife), and said that the amount of clothing you wear is up to you. If it means a bra and a cute pair of shorts, then so be it. You have to remember, some of the clothing that the girls wear cover as much as a swimsuit does, so whats the difference? You have the right to sign a release agreement with the photographer, and you can choose which photos you want released and which you dont. (A professional photographer will choose less risque photos in respect). I am all for boudoir, as I am looking forward to giving my FI a special gift before the wedding!
Finding Beauty In Negative Spaces Blog
I've wanted to do get some elvgren-style pinups of myself done for a while now.
I agree with everyone - they can be really awesome, or really tacky, so if you do it, just be selective about who does it and who sees it.
OT and mini-thread-jack: SarahPLiz, I love the pic in your siggy!
June siggy challenge!
[QUOTE]Depending upon the bride and the photographer, they can go either way. I REALLY strongly dislike the weird pregnancy photos that women are taking now with just sheets draping themselves. Pregnancy is beautiful but I just find the pictures really creepy. Back to your question, I like the 1940's pinup style boudoir pictures, they're really kitschy and cute, I don't really like when they get raunchy.
Posted by 526SadieSadie[/QUOTE]
Kind of OT, but so true! My sister is a "nestie," and I'm creeped out by the whole Nest thing because too many women think pregnancy is so beautiful that everyone needs to see their bulging stomachs. I'm going to be a physician in a few years, and there is little that fazes me after ten years in the medical field, and pregancy is beautiful. But certain pictures should only be shared with those who love you enough to really appreciate them!
And far as your kids finding them....you keep them in a private place just like lingerie. And as long as the shoots aren't nude...if your (future) children do end up finding them, it will not be a truamatic event.
I would suggest carefully selecting your photographer. Make sure they have done this before to avoid awkward photos and that they have a privacy policy. Talk or meet with them so you feel comfortable. If you are not comfortable in the shoot, it will show in your pictures.
I've always known that they exist. I figured that if someone was out there taking pictures for adult magazines, there's probably someone out there taking pictures for women who want to create something similar for their FI/H.
I'm not concerned about my theoretical future children findiing them. I feel different about nudity and sexuality than some people. Part of that's because of the very practical way my parents treated nudity, explained bodily functions, and treated my own comparisons of art vs porn. I'd want my children to know that it's OK to be/feel sexy, to know about their bodies, and to not be embarrassed by their own or my sexuality. Now, I'm not saying I'd specifically show them, but the embarrassment wouldn't be there if the pictures were found.
I think it comes down to what's comfortable for you and your FI. If you're comfortable taking the pictures, then do. If you're pretty sure that FI would like them, then get them done. But if either you or FI is uncomfortable with the thought of someone else seeing you semi or fully nude then don't push the envelope.
[QUOTE]These aren't MEANT for random people on the interwebz. They are meant for the lover of the person who took them.
Posted by StageManager14[/QUOTE]
I think that's what shocked me about the forum post I saw. I was just kinda... I mean... really? You want pictures like that of yourself on the internet? That was really trashy to me. I understand wanting to feel sexy and good about yourself, but goddamn! Like I said, I'm not typically conservative, but when it comes down to half naked pictures of me, a degree of modesty suddenly rises.
I really appreciate the input! I'm going for it - but for my FH's eyes only.
It's very important to bring along "examples" when you look for a photographer and discuss their philosophy on things like that. I had some done as a Christmas gift, and she played a lot on light, color, and making use of things around like chairs, windows, etc. (CLOSED WINDOWS!)
I'm normally pretty conservative, but the right photographer can make you feel very comfortable and sexy. I'm not sure about all these people saying their fiances and husbands wouldn't want these pictues. There's more to intimacy than you just putting on something tiny, taking it off, and having sex. And a digital camera does nothing compared to a professional that can make a good picture look alluring and sexy. It adds to the fun of it! It would be great to give him the pictures a short while before the wedding, especially if you're abstaining for a period of time before the wedding night.
And for what it's worth, I gave a book of my pictures to my fiance Christmas morning. He proposed that night.
I had different outfits - including his muay tai shorts and a pair of jeans of his that I have been trying to get him to throw out forever now! They are supposed to be fun pics that are especially for him. I plan to give the scrap book that I am going to make for him the week before our wedding - as I am sure that it will be a bit stressful durring that week with all the wedding stuff at full tilt, and it will allow him to relax and enjoy. And I can't wait to give it to him.
And on a side note, if you have the right photographer, she will make you feel comfortable enough and work with you to achieve the results that you want for your pics. I recommend anyone to get them done because I would say that was one of the greatest kind of liberating experiences I have ever had!!
I have mixed feelings about this. I think most guys would think of a boudoir album as something to add to the "spank bank" if you know what I mean. I kinda think it leans more towards the trashy end when its thought of this way.
If I were to do it though, I do also agree with the majority that the photography style, poses, and outfits play the largest role in wheather it would be classy or trashy looking.
outside of classy or trashy, i would say they're just unnecessary. with all the other things a person needs to do for their wedding and the costs associated with those things, this just seems like an expense that can be avoided. i understand that at the very least the shots are for a person's husband, but at the same time it might be best to save the cash and opt for higher quality engagement and wedding photos you can share with everyone tastefully.
going back to the question of classy or trashy, i guess any photo can be done up with some class but i'd have to say that the nature of the photos are intimate so they shouldn't be shared with others. a question for a bride considering these photos is: who are the photos really for, your hubby or you? if it's for him then it's really for his eyes only. if it's more for you so you can chronicle how awesome you looked once upon a time, then i can see wanting to share them with other female friends/relatives that you're close to. might be inappropriate to show other men outside your hubby though.