this is the code for the render ad
Wedding Cakes & Food Forum

Are you doing buffet or sit down dinner?

The venue we are having our wedding at has the option of a sit down dinner or a buffet. The sit down dinner is $10 more per person and its a salad, and pasta, and then a choice of NEw York Sirloin Steak w/ mushrooms or Chicken and Shrimp Francese.
The Buffet we get to chose I think 5 different things as well as the pasta and salad. I feel like you get more with the buffet and i am sure everyone can find something that they like.
Do people typically do buffets for weddings?
August 2011 May Siggy Challenge~ Honeymoon Photobucket www.MyVacationCountdown.com Ticker LilySlim Weight loss tickers
133 image Invited to celebrate Jersey Shore style!
85 image Will be fist pumpin' on the dance floor!
11 image Won't be having any fun
37 image Can't Find their mailbox

«1

Re: Are you doing buffet or sit down dinner?

  • SD3194SD3194 member
    100 Comments
    edited December 2011
    Every wedding I've ever attended has been a buffet. It's usually cheaper and offers more variety than a plated dinner. However, if you're having a massive guests list then I would recommend doing a plated dinner so you don't have to worry about a long line. Nothing is worse than waiting in line forever for dinner.
  • edited December 2011
    We're doing the buffet.
  • edited December 2011
    I did a sit down dinner at my wedding, which is typical of other weddings I've been to in my family/social circle.  I just think that a plated meal make the reception nicer and more formal.  As a guest, I don't like standing in a long line at a buffet or sitting at my table waiting to be "released" to go up to the buffet.  I also like having food that is nicely arranged on the plate, versus plopping a bunch of food on my plate going through a buffet.

    There's no right or wrong way to go in this case.  Just personal preference.
  • SuMmErKuTiESuMmErKuTiE member
    2500 Comments Fourth Anniversary 5 Love Its Combo Breaker
    edited December 2011
    We had stations because we always prefer buffets or stations because DH and I are always hungry after a plated meal at a wedding. They either don't give you enough, or it's not fresh or hot enough, or you don't like what it comes with. We actually get excited when we're invited to weddings that have stations or buffets because we know we'll be able to choose what and how much to eat. When it's a plated dinner, DH always makes us hit up the drive-thru on the way home because he's so hungry.

    The stations at our wedding were set up beautifully.. no bunson burners or anything like that and the display was amazing. We had a carving station with prime rib, ham, and turkey, a tuscan station, a summer grill station, and a pasta station. The guests loved the variety and the ability to go back up for as much as they liked which we definitely saw people doing. We had a formal wedding and it didn't take away from the formality at all.
  • BlueBoxBrideBlueBoxBride member
    100 Comments 5 Love Its
    edited December 2011
    We're doing plated.
    "I liked it, so I put a ring on it" - future Mr. Box
  • edited December 2011
     We're doing plated. I think it's more relaxing for everyone than a buffet. I don't like lines or having to carry my food across a room. Plus it seems like I'm always the one who gets to the buffet as food is running out. So I either get the last dried up bits of food in a dish or I have to wait for more food to come out. I would never side-eye anyone for having a buffet, but that's just not what I want at my wedding.
  • AshRoussAshRouss member
    10 Comments
    edited December 2011
    I am doing  a buffet.  Our favorite Italian restaurant does a buffet catered meal and we couldnt pass it up. I am so ecited to share our favorite food with our guest. 

    :)
    Cooking my way to happiness!
  • fallbride1109fallbride1109 member
    5000 Comments Fifth Anniversary 5 Love Its Name Dropper
    edited December 2011
    Ditto SummerKutie, we did more of a station buffet.  Plated would have been $5 more pp at our venue and that was too much.  Plus my husband didn't want the "formality" of a plated dinner--although we had a pretty nice, formal hotel wedding.  It didn't take away from anything and worked out fine.  If plated is in your budget, that is the way I would go but a buffet is perfecty fine also.
  • edited December 2011
    We did a buffet.
    panther
  • edited December 2011
    We're doing a plated dinner. It is more common in our social circle and I just prefer it :-)
  • edited December 2011
    Suit down here. Dont know what to have though. I know one choice will be chicken parmasain because its a food that my fiance always made for our anniverseries.
    Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • TEA&CoTEA&Co member
    100 Comments
    edited December 2011
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/special-topic-wedding-boards_food-cakes_doing-buffet-plated-dinner?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Special Topic Wedding BoardsForum:23Discussion:16603fff-0006-4f77-9f93-b0fa67801967Post:30c2ecbd-cced-417c-b12a-fe7877e12fc7">Re: Are you doing buffet or sit down dinner?</a>:
    [QUOTE]I did a sit down dinner at my wedding, which is typical of other weddings I've been to in my family/social circle.  I just think that a plated meal make the reception nicer and more formal.  As a guest, I don't like standing in a long line at a buffet or sitting at my table waiting to be "released" to go up to the buffet.  I also like having food that is nicely arranged on the plate, versus plopping a bunch of food on my plate going through a buffet. There's no right or wrong way to go in this case.  Just personal preference.
    Posted by SaraAndrew2010[/QUOTE]

    Ditto this, exactly, except that we're not married yet!
    Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • topchef33topchef33 member
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2011
    Our venue only offers plated dinners.

    I don't mind a buffet as long as it doesn't take 30 minutes to get my food. We went to a wedding where there were 2 tables of buffet food (both the same items) and people could line up on both sides of the tables.

    Anniversary [center]My Chart[/center] Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • vigneslevignesle member
    10 Comments
    edited December 2011
    I think it depends on your social circle as to what is considered "normal" for a wedding. Personally I prefer seated.

    My wedding was plated, because that's kind of the norm for our crowd of friends and my family. But I know my DH side of the family almost always has buffet dinners at their weddings
  • doeie04doeie04 member
    1000 Comments Combo Breaker
    edited December 2011
    We are doing buffet. It is the norm for our circle.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • edited December 2011
    Buffet. I've been to an even mix of both and I prefer buffet-style. FI and I both want to make sure that our guests get enough to eat and won't leave hungry. The last wedding we went to, FI's cousin's wedding, there was a plated dinner and the portions were very small. It didn't bother me much because I don't need to eat a ton, but the men at the table were filling up on rolls and the candy buffet after dinner was over. 
  • RebeccaB88RebeccaB88 member
    2500 Comments Fifth Anniversary 500 Love Its 5 Answers
    edited December 2011
    Both FI and I despise plated meals, so we will only consider a buffet.
  • edited December 2011
    We are doing a buffet.  Our family and friends like to eat so we want them to be able to go back for seconds if they choose.
  • edited December 2011
    It's really all up to your preference.  Think about what your guests would want more.  I am planning on doing a sit down to make the atmoshphere seem more formal.
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • edited December 2011

    I personally love a buffet, and I think if the food is delicious a line is a minor annyance.  It also depends on the style of your reception and your crowd.  Ours is less formal and we are doing semi seated.  Salad and dinner rolls served at the table, then the tables will be escorted to the buffet line.  Plated is nice, but I like choices especially since one of our proteins is beef tenderloin.  Most of my family likes their steak done at least medium and his likes it closer to medium rare so having a carving station gives as an opportunity to make everyone happy. 

  • edited December 2011
    At my venue I could have gotten family-style for $1 pp more than buffet, but I chose buffet since we're doing round tables and the last wedding I was at we didn't really have enough room on the table for all of the dishes of food. They set up the buffet so there are two lines at once going through and getting their food, so it'll be much faster than a normal buffet.
  • lanejanelanejane member
    100 Comments
    edited December 2011
    We're doing a sit down dinner. Our venue is extremely formal and it just seems appropriate. Plus I like to be waited on and not have to walk across slippery floors in a dress and heels with a plate full of spaghetti and bright red sauce! Yell
    Photobucket Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • KJ7985KJ7985 member
    10 Comments
    edited December 2011
    I think the size of your wedding and--perhaps more importantly--the efficiency of your venue has a lot to do with guest satisfaction. We went to one buffet wedding (140 people) and we were able to get our food quickly--it was great, perfect, awesome. We went to a somewhat larger wedding (200+) and they did a buffet. Our table was seated for an hour and twenty minutes before we could even get our food! We were starving! If you go for a buffet, make sure that your venue can efficiently accomodate your group size.


    Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • mica178mica178 member
    5000 Comments Fourth Anniversary 5 Love Its
    edited December 2011
    We did sit-down.  My family would have been horrified if it was a buffet, my father especially.  I'm not a fan of standing in a buffet line in a nice dress and cannot imagine doing it in my wedding gown.
  • VRLVRL
    10 Comments
    edited December 2011
    We're having a buffet. My family and my FI's family appreciates good food and lots of it - they also don't appreciate overly formal atmospheres - so a buffet is perfect.

    To help prevent line congestion, I'm going to ask my venue to set up stations - an appetizer station, two separate entree stations, and a dessert station - with one of each station set up on either side of the ballroom.

    That way our guests can divide themselves between the two sets of stations, hopefully reducing wait times; and with the food separated into stations, our guests would only have to wait for the foods they actually want.

    I'm not entirely sure yet if that will be feasible (and if it is, at what cost), but that's how I hope to set up our 'buffet' so that the buffet feel and long lines are reduced, while providing our friends and families with as many options for food as possible.
    imageWedding Countdown Ticker
  • edited December 2011
    We are doing family style. It kindof combines buffet and plated. I have been to weddings with all three types of meals and to be honest I more clearly remember the flavor of the food and not the manner it was served.
  • jess9802jess9802 member
    Knottie Warrior 500 Comments Combo Breaker
    edited December 2011
    We're doing buffet. With 45 guests or so the line shouldn't be too ridiculous, and servers at a backyard wedding would be over the top. Besides, I do like the ability of our guests to pick and choose what amounts and kinds of food they like.
  • BudnotesBudnotes member
    100 Comments
    edited December 2011
    For me, most weddings I've been to were always a plated dinner.   I went to only a handful of weddings that were buffets and personally, it made the wedding appear cheap.  My husband is a big guy and at his cousin's wedding we went to the buffet and they asked him what he wanted chicken or fish - he wanted to try both and they actually told him it was one or the other!  I thought a buffet meant you got to have a little bit of everything!  I say a plated dinner is the way to go. 
    Daisypath Anniversary tickers Lilypie Trying to Conceive Event tickers image Daisypath Christmas tickers
  • wiser516wiser516 member
    10 Comments
    edited December 2011
    We are doing a plated dinner.  I like the sit down dinners better because then you don't have all of your guest standing in a line waiting to get food and i think its more elegant for a wedding to be a plated dinner.  I've been to weddings that are buffet style and the wait of the line and until your table can go it gets frustrating because by the time you get your food most of the people are already done with their food and sometimes they run out of food so you have to wait till they come to refill the buffet.  If you do a plated dinner you can have a cocktail and ors D'oeuvres hour.
  • edited December 2011
    We are doing the buffet dinner with 3 entrees.  It allows more of a selection for our guests (and it costs less too!).
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards