this is the code for the render ad
Community› Wedding Discussion Boards› Pre-wedding Parties
Pre-wedding Parties
New Discussion

No Host Shower

Re: No Host Shower

  • FayeValentine69FayeValentine69
    10 Comments
    edited December 2011
    Yes, it's rude.  Very very rude.  Of course, potluck showers are rude too.  You host the shower that you can afford for the bride, and if you cannot afford one, you don't host one.
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Report Reply
  • MairePoppyMairePoppy mod
    Moderator Knottie Warrior 5000 Comments 500 Love Its
    edited December 2011
    No-host showers are rude. If you can't afford to host this party, then don't have it. You are already being generous by hosting a shower for the b2b, in her hometown.

                       
    Report Reply
  • sister2groomsister2groom
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2011
    Very rude, if cost/space is an issue I'm not sure why he bride needs 3 showers, none are necessary, 2 is plenty. There's no way I would attend a shower that was $18+ to attend.
    Report Reply
  • McKenna2012McKenna2012 member
    100 Comments
    edited December 2011
    I'm confused.  If you are already hosting another shower for her, why is this even your concern? Let someone else host this one or scrap it.
    Wedding Countdown Ticker Photobucket
    Report Reply
  • deepcovejackiedeepcovejackie
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2011
    Skip the no-host shower and just have the other ones.  That's really rude to ask guests for a cheque ahead of time.
    Report Reply
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards