Ok so i have never posted on this board but I thought this might be a good place to try my question first...we just planned our invitations and we are going through everything before we send the order off and they have the word honor spelled "honour"- is this like special wedding spelling? can the word honor be spelled two different ways? It is not to late to change the details-so someone please set me straight! Is this the right way to spell honor on a wedding invitation? did anyone else spell it this way?
Re: invitation spelling "honour"????
I remember going through a phase in middle/high school where I spelled things like that because I thought it was "smarter". I would probably go with good old stardard american english, if I were you.
Also "the favour of a reply."
40/112
Judge me all you want, but to me, the wording of the invites was one of those stupid little battles that I really didn't care if my mother won or not, lol.
Considering that nobody said anything about, and my family is the type that would bring something like that to my attention if they thought it was a big deal.Literally 20 minutes before my ceremony started, my one aunt stormed into the bridal suite and berated me for "allowing" my 91-year-old arthritus-ridden wheel-chair bound great grandmother to wear a pretty velvet track suit, so I'm sure I would have been told if this was a problem.
If you fire a WP member, you're against America.
"Meg cracks me up on the regular. Now she gets to do it in two different forums. Yay!!" ~mkrupar
In more recent times Americans decided to alter the spelling for reasons that I don't know.
If you are not getting married in a chuch, then you would say either.....Your presence is request or The pleasure of your company is requested ....
If you are getting married in a church and use honour, then you need to use the same format on your reply cards......The favour of a reply is requested.....
For formal invitations both honour and favour are the correct spellings.
[QUOTE]In more recent times Americans decided to alter the spelling for reasons that I don't know.
Posted by 7298607477829237[/QUOTE]
Noah Webster. Wanted to build an independent American language identity. Or something like that, expressed with fewer buzz-words and more adjectives, in good 18th century style.
I can't remember where I picked it up, but I did hear that he intentionally changed spellings in his first dictionary for the above purpose. Although it could have been told to me by a bitter Canadian, tired of having her "Britishisms" corrected.