Folk dancing and music played a HUGE part in how FI and I started dating, we both really enjoy it, and we regularly attend local dances. We also don't know how to ballroom dance, and I abhor most modern music. We're debating the merits of having a contra dance as part of our wedding reception - I think it would be meaningful and significant, not to mention more fun and more likely to get people dancing, and he thinks that people expect traditional dancing and that with a lot of beginners the dance would be awkward. I also think it would be a great way for us to socialize, since you dance with everyone.
We plan to have about two hours of dancing time after the meal. There are four people who I know are regular dancers on the guest list (including us and my MOH), five people from my side of the family who will be open to trying it (basically everyone from my side who is capable of dancing), and FI thinks he remembers going to a contra dance at one of his cousins' weddings. The band would also be able to play waltzes, foxtrots, and polkas if the contras weren't working. We're having the reception in a hotel.
How would you react if you were a guest at such a wedding? All of our guests know the emotional significance, but half of FI's family is very stuck on tradition. How would you indicate that spike heels might not be the best option?
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml