Yes, this is the kids v no kids debate again, but hopefully not an actual debate. Long.When I first started vaguely planning, I had a sister telling me I MUST include kids, because my cousin D is SO CUTE and how could I have a wedding without him? While my mom is telling me "oh yes you CAN have a wedding without kids and everyone will get over it."Problem being, NO ONE asked me if I wanted or didn't want kids there.First I will address the money issue - priority #1 for me is guest list. We ARE on a smaller budget, but I will determine who I want there, whether it includes kids or not, and work the budget around that number. Children will not be excluded to save money. Period.Here's the issue. We're picking a location within the next week, and that does rely on numbers and totals and such, so I need to decide. The total with kids is around 130 invites, without, about 105-110. So, it's a lot of kids.Without going into detail about how an age cut off is not practical (and you'll have to trust enough to believe that it is, because of the age of all the cousins), here's the problem.I LOVE the idea of a wedding with all my little cousins and friends running around. If everyone came, it would range from 17 on down to possibly just months old.I also LOVE the idea of an adults only evening. It's a night reception, open bar, and having no kids around would be great as well.Solutions such as having a babysitter or having a kids' area have been considered and discarded for various reasons. Again, in the interest of [somewhat] brevity, you'll have to believe me on that.I really and truly, genuinely and seriously, LOVE both ideas. It's all or nothing in this case - no one under 18, or 20 some kids.Which would you choose?
On bed rest since Groundhog's Day and every day since has been exactly the same.
Blog