Fh and I are both born in the same city in Europe, but I have spent almost all my life in Canada, and he has spent most of his adult life here. Most of our family is in Europe, and most of our friends are in Canada.
Because of this huge divide, we decided to have two weddings (civil ceremony and reception in Canada, and spiritual ceremony and reception in Romania). This way every one could take part in our big day.
Originally, we had said that we will invite people to the wedding that they're geographically closer to, except maybe for super immediate close family (such as grandparents). By doing this, we would have a balanced guest list of approximately 200 people at each wedding. After fh and I seemingly agreed on this, I got a curveball.
Seems that his family wants to invite everyone from Romania to the wedding in Canada, and just host a party in Romania for those that "Can't come". I feel like this is unfair as it becomes a competiton of who can afford it and who can't... and the people that can't are going to get the short end of the stick since they won't be attending a wedding of the same caliber if we were to make the one in Canada a major one.
Also, his family wants to send out DOUBLE the invites (an invite to everyone for both weddings), which would easily cost another $2,000 more. None of these changes are in our budget... nor is the venue we had previously agreed upon big enough to make these changes (so we would HAVE to change venues!).
Do you think it would be rude to stick to the original plan (and invite people to where they are geographically closest to), or do we have to double up and invite to both? ANd if plan B is the answer, how do we go about choosing venues, budgeting, and all the other logistics stuff?