I'm torn about whether we should include a unity ceremony of some sort in our ceremony. Most of the weddings I've attended have a unity candle. More and more I'm hearing about all sorts of other unity ceremonies, like sand or wine. I've always thought that the unity candle is kind of overkill, and that the wedding ceremony itself should suffice. If we don't include a unity ceremony, will our guests think that's weird or inappropriate? I don't want to do anything incorrect.
Re: Is it frowned upon to not have a unity ceremony?
We're not having one either. If such a ceremony (or something else) has special meaning to you, then by all means, do it. But it's certainly not necessary.
SaveSave
Fatty Blog
[QUOTE]I've only seen a unity candle at one wedding, back in the 80s. I've never seen a rose or sand ceremony - in fact, I never heard of them until The Knot, and I'm 48.
Posted by RetreadBride[/QUOTE]<div>
</div><div>You should consider yourself very lucky! EVERYBODY does them here, I swear. Or the wine ceremony. Sometimes they have 2!!! I am getting so much flack from people because I'm not doing any extras, it's crazy.
</div>
To each his own.