this is the code for the render ad
Wedding Party

Children in Bridal Party - Disagreement over Who

Let me start with some background so you understand where I'm coming from: I have lots of kids in my immediate family. Nine nieces and nephews--and all of them under 12 years old. My hubbie-to-be does not have any children, nieces, nephews, or godchildren. Neither do most of his groomsmen. One guy has a 13 year old son, but that's it.

So, considering our lineup, I thought it made sense that 100% of the flower girls and ring boys came from my family. BZZZZT!, Wrong. The fiance is now saying that "people" will be offended if we don't also include kids from his side of the family. "Um, ok, who?" I asked. He gave me the names of a cousin or two with little kids, and one random friend I met once, and whose kids I have never met. 

I need to stress--the PARENTS of these kids are not in the wedding party. My fiance is even a little hazy with the kids' names, and I doubt he could tell you how old they are or when their birthdays are.

Including them in the wedding party would mean they, and their parents, would obviously need to attend the rehearsal, rehearsal dinner, buy the outfit, pose for photos, be introduced at the reception, etc. Practically speaking, it makes sense to stick to the kids in my family. Why "outsource" these roles when we have plenty of kiddos in my family alone?   

Am I breaking a rule by saying no? Is it important that the kid selection be distributed equally among the two families? If he had kids he was close to, of course we'd include them. But to dig up random kids from his guest list, just for the sake of even distribution, makes no sense to me.

Re: Children in Bridal Party - Disagreement over Who

  • itzMSitzMS member
    2500 Comments 500 Love Its 5 Answers First Anniversary
    In Response to Children in Bridal Party - Disagreement over Who:
    [QUOTE]Let me start with some background so you understand where I'm coming from: I have lots of kids in my immediate family. Nine nieces and nephews--and all of them under 12 years old. My hubbie-to-be does not have any children, nieces, nephews, or godchildren. Neither do most of his groomsmen. One guy has a 13 year old son, but that's it. So, considering our lineup, I thought it made sense that 100% of the flower girls and ring boys came from my family. BZZZZT!, Wrong. The fiance is now saying that "people" will be offended if we don't also include kids from his side of the family. "Um, ok, who?" I asked. He gave me the names of a cousin or two with little kids, and one random friend I met once, and whose kids I have never met.  I need to stress--the PARENTS of these kids are not in the wedding party. My fiance is even a little hazy with the kids' names, and I doubt he could tell you how old they are or when their birthdays are. Including them in the wedding party would mean they, and their parents, would obviously need to attend the rehearsal, rehearsal dinner, buy the outfit, pose for photos, be introduced at the reception, etc. Practically speaking, it makes sense to stick to the kids in my family. Why "outsource" these roles when we have plenty of kiddos in my family alone?    Am I breaking a rule by saying no? Is it important that the kid selection be distributed equally among the two families? If he had kids he was close to, of course we'd include them. But to dig up random kids from his guest list, just for the sake of even distribution, makes no sense to me.
    Posted by anneandsean29[/QUOTE]

    Sounds like you should just skip having kids involved. Not worth causing a tiff with FI and his family over. Invite the kids as guests. Plus, how on earth would you involve 9 nieces and nephews without it looking a bit excessive?
  • I would just skip having any kids in the wedding party completely.  By doing that you avoid any argument or fight with your FI or either side of the family.  And you save yourself from a lot of stress.

  • There is absolutely no reason he needs to have "representation" among the kid BP.  I agree the 9 is a lot, so if you're not totally set on having them having no kids would be easier.  But we had 7 and it wasn't that big a deal (they walked 3, 2, and 2 so it didn't take forever).  Your FI is being ridiculous to include children he doesn't even know....
  • Ring Bearer is my nephew; Flower Girl is my best friends daughter.  FI or his family could not care one way or the other.  The family kids are invited and they were excited for that.  Unless FI side has a kid he or you know well, it would be weird to ask them anyway.   
    image

    Anniversary
  • Like any member of the bridal party, they should be people you're close to, regardless of their blood status to you or relationship to the bridal party. If you don't feel comfortable with choosing some and not others, then I definitely suggest skipping having a flower girl and ring bearers. This way, no feelings can possibly get hurt by choosing some and not others. And you are smart to take cost into consideration.
    image
  • edited May 2013
    FWIW, the two kids in our wedding party were both from my side of the family. There are pretty much no children on H's side, with the exception of our niece, who wasn't even born until after our wedding. But he does actually spend time with the boy who was our ringbearer. If there are no children your fiancé is close to, I don't understand his insistence on including ones he's not.

    ETA: Then they're just props.
    image
  • vk2204vk2204 member
    1000 Comments Third Anniversary 100 Love Its Name Dropper
    Do you plan on including all 9 kids in your WP? We had 4 kids in ours, the two girls (9 and 7) were bridesmaids and the two boys (4 and 2) were ring bearers. 3 out of the 4 were my cousins, and 1 was my H's nephew. He never thought of it as me having more because he considers my family as his family too.
    image 
  • I know kids are cute in weddings but like you said, then they need to be invited to Rehersal & Dinner along with parents plus gifts for them all, the photos, flowers for each of them, Then there is the risk of their schedules for naps not working well with your wedding day schedule or tantrums.

    If your budget & patience will allow for all of that, go for it, but personally I vote skip the flower girls & ring bearers totally. Then no one's feelings are hurt.

  • Thanks everyone for the feedback! This is so helpful. Originally, I was only going to have 3 nieces and 2 nephews participate. The other nephews are older and really not interested. The boys can walk down together and the three girls together, so it wouldn't take too long. 

    I see the wisdom of not including any children in order to keep the peace. But the less compassionate part of me thinks that if some cousin gets offended because her little angels were not selected, that's totally absurd and not my problem. 

    I'll have to give it more thought. His family does seem to be easily offended, which is a bigger problem...   
  • I agree with this. Your wp, including fg and rb should be those closest to you, not kids you don't really know. In your case I agree that you should not choose any since 9 is a lot. Fwiw, I have 5 and h has 4 nieces and nephews. We ended up asking the oldest if his 4, and there were no hurt feelings, but those are our family dynamics.

    image
  • In Response to Re:Children in Bridal Party Disagreement over Who:[QUOTE]Don't have kids in the wedding party.They usually don't care.nbsp; It's the parents who get bent out of shape if they can't showcase their Little Sugarbuns at your wedding.Have them all as guests and then you have no hurt feelings. Posted by RetreadBride[/QUOTE] Not entirely true. I distinctly remember all of the girls in elementary school with me bragging about being a flower girl and I was always butt hurt because I hadn't been asked to be one yet. True story.
  • In Response to Re: Children in Bridal Party - Disagreement over Who:
    [QUOTE]There is absolutely no reason he needs to have "representation" among the kid BP.  I agree the 9 is a lot, so if you're not totally set on having them having no kids would be easier.  But we had 7 and it wasn't that big a deal (they walked 3, 2, and 2 so it didn't take forever).  Your FI is being ridiculous to include children he doesn't even know....
    Posted by Kate61487[/QUOTE]

    In Response to Re: Children in Bridal Party - Disagreement over Who:
    [QUOTE]Honestly, I would be more offended if my (hypothetical) kids were not close to the B&G and asked to be in the wedding than if they were excluded. Using them as cute props is worse than not being in the WP, IMO, so I'm not sure why anyone on his side would be offended.
    Posted by Liatris2010[/QUOTE]

    Both of these, 100%.  Show your FI this thread.  No one should be in your wedding party who is not even a part of your life.  People are not props. 

    I would eliminate kids from the WP altogether so as not to offend FI's family (even though they would be ridiculous to get offended at uneven "representation").
    image
    Daisypath Anniversary tickersFollow Me on Pinterest
  • If your fiance is like mine, he doesn't know much about weddings & may think that the kids in the bridal party should mirror the "grown-up" bridal party - your bridesmaids & his groomsmen. If you explain that just like you wouldn't add extra groosmen you didn't really know, you don't add children that you don't really know. Maybe he's just naive to the way weddings work. I'd give him the benefit of the doubt, but if all else fails... I don't think you should feel compelled to compromise by having kids you don't know in your wedding party.
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards