Wedding Etiquette Forum

Vent: random etiquette talk with coworkers

So my cubemate is getting married next year. I like to gab about weddings and the article had just come out about the people who gave the food basket and the brides went ape$h*+ on them. So I wondered if "covering your plate" was a thing where he was from (New York).

So I told him that I didn't any gift should be expected and asked his thoughts. He pretty much said where he comes from almost everyone always give cash, and tries to pay more than what they think it cost to feed them. He said that weddings were about helping the couple start out on their future together and most people there expected to get back what the wedding cost and then some.
And this guy isn't crazy or rude in other ways. What I know about the wedding thus far, they're following a lot of the normal etiquette rules.
He also thinks it's still expected that the bride's family pay for the wedding and the groom's family pay for the rehearsal dinner and he said he hopes he doesn't have any daughters because of that.

I'm just... what? Is this really a thing? Do that many people really think that way?

I know we hate generalizing by region here on the board, but I have a lot of family from where the wedding will be held and where the bride's family is from. I warned him the mentality might be different there and they really might not make all their money back, but it isn't because the guests don't wish them well in their lives together.
And then I dropped it and slinked away....


And then I went to lunch with a work friend of mine who is also getting married next spring. He told me his fiancee still hasn't found full time employment and they were thinking about getting married next month so she can go on his insurance.
I asked if they'd still have the wedding and he said yes because they'd already put the money down. We're buds so I decided to be candid even though I probably shouldn't have (oh well. my bad). I said "Oh dude. Don't have a fake wedding." And he said no one would know. And then I was like, "DUDE. Don't lie to your friends and family." (and yes, I usually do say "dude" when I talk to him).

I told him personally, I go to a wedding to see two people I love joined in marriage, and if I know they're already married, I really don't care nearly as much, and if I found out I was lied to, I'd be pissed. I suggested getting married now and just throwing the reception portion of the wedding next year. But then he said that his fiancee would be really sad if she didn't get her ceremony. I bit my tongue and refrained from saying, "you mean a pretty princess day" and just said I doubted the ceremony would really mean as much if they were already married.
This is when the guy in front of us in line pitched in and voiced his agreement with my friend... and said something nonsensical about when you go to a theater the actors aren't really enjoying the show they're putting on; they're just doing it for everyone else. So a fake ceremony was the same way. Or something. It made no sense.
I used the graduation reenactment anecdote and asked if you'd really want to go to THAT and he said, "depends how good the party was."

Eventually we decided to agree to disagree and he told me if he does end up getting married early that he won't tell me. I laughed and said, "good, because I'll judge you." And we dropped the subject and talked about my delicious salad.


But these are really good, really smart guys. And I'm just... what?
«1

Re: Vent: random etiquette talk with coworkers

  • Smart does not always equal etiquette-conscious. My fiancé is extremely smart and savvy, a total people-pleaser and social butterfly - but he has been clueless about wedding etiquette. You wouldn't believe how many times we've fought about inviting extra people in place of invitees that are "definitely not coming". (I'm glad I died on that hill, and now, so is he. We have received 70 RSVPs back already and among them, only ONE decline!)

    You did your part. But I would totally not go to that friend's "wedding"!
  • Obviously not etiquette smart. TBH though, a lot of people just don't know any better. IMHO, it's one thing if someone just doesn't know any better, but it's another bag entirely if they know better and do it anyway.

    In reference to the bride's family paying for everything, FI's family thinks this way. I couldn't give two beans whether or not they contributed, but they told us (unsolicited and point blank) they weren't contributing because it's tradition that my family should foot the bill.... yet got upset when we planned the wedding in my home state. I have utmost respect for people who are traditional - as long as they don't choose to only abide by traditions that convenience them.
    *********************************************************************************

    image
  • SERIOUSLY.  I don't know why people forget the point of the day.  We went to a wedding last summer and one of FI's friends texted him to ask if we were going to "the church."  You mean THE WEDDING?  The day isn't about the reception!

  • aurianna said:
    He also thinks it's still expected that the bride's family pay for the wedding and the groom's family pay for the rehearsal dinner and he said he hopes he doesn't have any daughters because of that.

    In a time when women did not work at paid jobs outside the home, a young woman was supported by her father up until her wedding, then was "given away" to the husband who would support her from then on.

    A new husband has his hands full figuring out how to support a new wife and possibly future children. Thus, the bride's father paid for the wedding. The groom's father was prepared to help support the new couple should the groom's own funds fall short.

    Those were the Bad Old Pre-Feminist Days.

    Today?

    Wedding planning is complex, and it's no good to have too many planners. Two planners with one line of communication is best. (Bride and her mother. Bride and groom.) When you get too many planners, there are too many lines of communication and too many chances for foul-ups.

    Thus, today, in my opinion, I think it best for the bride and her family (usually mom could be dad) to plan and pay for the wedding and the groom and his family (mom or dad) to plan and pay for the rehearsal dinner and honeymoon. The rehearsal dinner gives the groom's parents an opportunity to host their own event, inviting who they choose, etc. 

    That's ideal, and as we know little in life is ideal.

    The co-workers in the story are naïve.
  • The whole covering your plate thing is unfortunately discussed in my circle... area? Blech. Please don't judge all New Yorkers based on a few.

    I don't get the whole actors not enjoying the show they're putting on... If they hate it so much, then why are they doing it? Same goes for an already married couple.
    image
  • I've heard the "cover your plate" thing here in California. I pretty much ignore it, and just give a gift appropriate to the couple's circs, my relationship with them and my own budget.

    I do try to be generous, though.
  • As far as the first guy,  I must admit that I'm from NY and I tend to adhere to the cover your plate rule, as does my whole family and most people where I'm from.  I really just use it as a guideline for how much to give because I know couples spend a lot to host me at their wedding, and I like to give a generous gift that they'll appreciate.  I do not, however, think it is required, nor would I expect that same thought process from my own wedding guests.

    The bride's family pays thing makes me a little irritated.  FI's family feels that way and it doesn't really sit well with me.  I don't need/want their money, and they've offered to cover the rehearsal dinner which I very much appreciate, but I just don't like that attitude and certain comments they've made.

    As far as the PPD, some people just don't give a shit.  I really don't care too much if they're honest about it, but I'd be pretty pissed if I found out they lied.
    Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • My favorite aunt has a friend who believes in the cover your plate rule. They live in the Chicago-area, and I grew up a few hours south of there.  I had never heard of it before she mentioned it and then here on TK.


    What did you think would happen if you walked up to a group of internet strangers and told them to get shoehorned by their lady doc?~StageManager14
    image
  • I'm in St. Louis, and I hear the cover your plate rule frequently. FI's aunt even asked how much it was going to be per head so she could estimate the monetary value of stuff we would get.

    Since when did weddings become fundraisers?

    image
  • Also, I've always heard of 'cover your plate.'  But I also had no idea how much weddings cost until I started planning one, so I doubt I've ever successfully covered mine.
  • I hadn't heard the "cover your plate" rule before TK.
  • KDM323KDM323 member
    Knottie Warrior 500 Love Its 500 Comments Name Dropper
    I was raised with the "cover your plate" philosophy.    I would never expect that from guests...but I do give monetary gifts as a wedding present (and a physical gift for a shower)
    *** Fairy Tales Do Come True *** Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • I have heard the cover your plate rule, but no one I know expects that. It's more of a "that's awesome we got a gift, thanks!" versus "that's totally not worth what that couple's plates were worth". Ugh. I can't believe people expect this is some places... I'm from upstate NY, BTW. 
    Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • I'd never heard of "cover your plate" until TK either.

    Officially hitched as of 10/25/13

    Daisypath Anniversary tickers

     

    Daisypath Anniversary tickers

     

     

  • I've heard of the cover your plate rule, but I don't adhere to it.  Actually, if I did, for most family weddings I could get away with giving like $8...maybe I should start following this rule :)  In reality, though, how much I give depends on my relationship with the couple.  For very close friends or family members, I'll give more than to more distant family members or casual friends.  

    My parents and H's parents still adhere to the bride's family pays rule.  It resulted in my parents paying for my wedding, so I can't really complain.  My dad is just very traditional and he and my mom had been saving for my wedding and my sister's wedding for quite some time.  My dad would not have even considered not paying for the wedding, and would have been extremely offended if I had suggested otherwise.  I'm very grateful for my parents' help. It does irk me, though, when a couple believes that anyone else is "required" to contribute to their wedding.  
  • Oh and most people I know generally adhere to the bride's parents paying.  Groom then pays for rehearsal dinner and booze.  We're not necessarily following that. We're very fortunate that my parents are paying for most of the wedding.  If FI's parents don't offer to pay for a rehearsal dinner, which we don't think they should be obligated to, we plan to pay for it ourselves.  Easy peasy.  My parents have already offered to pick up the bar tab.
  • Ditto @southernbelle0915. FI's family has been very keen on the "bride's family pays" aspect of wedding planning (actually, it's 50-50 my parents/us). Fine, whatever. But they don't think they should pay for the RD (fine, whatever, you don't have to). But FFIL wants to give a toast, because "It's tradition and I'm the father of the groom and this is the tradition and I get to do this." Uhmmm....no. You do not get to pick and choose which traditions you like, so sorry.
    Anniversary

    image
    I'm gonna go with 'not my circus, not my monkeys.'
  • lemclane said:
    Ditto @southernbelle0915. FI's family has been very keen on the "bride's family pays" aspect of wedding planning (actually, it's 50-50 my parents/us). Fine, whatever. But they don't think they should pay for the RD (fine, whatever, you don't have to). But FFIL wants to give a toast, because "It's tradition and I'm the father of the groom and this is the tradition and I get to do this." Uhmmm....no. You do not get to pick and choose which traditions you like, so sorry.

    I don't think I've ever been to a wedding where the groom's father gives a toast. Or wait, do you mean at the RD? I haven't been to many of those, I suppose if the groom's parents are hosting, then it makes sense.  But if not, meh.
  • yeah, i'm from NY and subconsciously always try to "cover my plate" with the gift - not out of obligation, but if I know the couple is spending about $200 a head, I'm not going to send them a $40 gift. But, I'm also older and can afford nicer gifts now than in my 20s.

    I definitely don't expect that back, though. Even though our reception is about $200 a head, I'm just glad that people are traveling to be with us, and I really don't care if they give us gifts at all. Out of 150 guest, 130 have to travel 7-15 hours or more to get there, so honestly, their presence is the present!

  • The "cover your plate" rule is very common in my experience (in Ohio, for what it's worth). My family would always bring a card to the reception and see what the menu choices were/how many people where there/how nice the venue was before putting cash in the card.

    I would never expect this from guests, but knowing how crazy expensive weddings are has made me a bit more generous when gifting. 
    image

    Created by MyFitnessPal - Free Weight Loss Tools

    Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • The cover your plate rule is standard where I'm from (NJ/NYC). However, I don't see how giving a generous gift is rude? Sure, if people are purely using the "niceness" of the reception to gauge how much to give then that's rude? But in general, giving a nice gift is never rude.

  • The cover your plate rule is standard where I'm from (NJ/NYC). However, I don't see how giving a generous gift is rude? Sure, if people are purely using the "niceness" of the reception to gauge how much to give then that's rude? But in general, giving a nice gift is never rude.
    Giving a gift isn't rude. Demanding a large gift from your guests is.
    Wedding Countdown Ticker

    image
  • I've never heard of the cover your plate rule, but certainly there is no problem if a guest wants to use it as their own internal guideline.  The problem is when the bride starts informing people that they did not cover their plate and then demanding that they do so!

    My great aunt who was on a very fixed income gave me a $15 check for my graduation.  It touched my heart because I knew it was such a sacrifice for her to send me anything at all, I really had not been expecting it.  So I would never look down upon a gift just because somebody did not cover their plate!


  • Thus, today, in my opinion, I think it best for the bride and her family (usually mom could be dad) to plan and pay for the wedding and the groom and his family (mom or dad) to plan and pay for the rehearsal dinner and honeymoon. The rehearsal dinner gives the groom's parents an opportunity to host their own event, inviting who they choose, etc. 

    That's ideal, and as we know little in life is ideal.

    I do not agree with this. I think the couple should properly host the wedding they can afford. If parents offer to contribute because they want the couple to have a fancier wedding, fine. I think it's a ridiculous notion that parents should silo their contributions in a particular way based on their child's gender (the bride's parents pay for the dress, the reception, and the invitations, etc.; and the groom's parents for the RD, HM, transportation, etc.).

    What about a lesbian couple? Do their parents split the reception because they're both women? No RD? No HM? What about a gay male couple? No reception? Just an RD and HM?

    It just doesn't make sense. The couple should pay and they have the option to accept or decline any financial assistance that is offered.
    *********************************************************************************

    image
  • I've heard of the cover your plate rule, but my circle doesn't adhere to it. Granted, we're mostly young and have been broke for past weddings, so that probably plays a large role. I think it's a ridiculous rule though.
  • auriannaaurianna member
    Ninth Anniversary 1000 Comments 500 Love Its 5 Answers
    edited July 2013
    The cover your plate rule is standard where I'm from (NJ/NYC). However, I don't see how giving a generous gift is rude? Sure, if people are purely using the "niceness" of the reception to gauge how much to give then that's rude? But in general, giving a nice gift is never rude.
    The expectation just makes no sense to me. I'm from St. Louis too and I guess I've heard it, but it doesn't seem to be a thing in my circles. And I've honestly not heard it touted that much around here, personally.

    Dinner & alcohol at ours was about $130pp. Throw everything else in, probably $200 per person when it was all said and done? I know very, very few couples that could ever afford to give us $400 and I would never, ever want them too. Seriously. We gave them dinner, not a new gold watch. We "got back" maybe a fourth of it all and were very grateful to have all of those gifts on top of getting to share our wedding with our guests.

    Guests honor us with their presence at the ceremony.
    We thank them with a reception.
    I don't expect them to pay me back for thanking them.

    And I totally think it's bordering on insane that anyone would expect their guests to pay for a party they had no hand in planning.
    It's also not the guests' business how much we spent on the thank you gift for them so I don't even like the idea of their trying to calculate it out.

    And frankly... the way the "cover your plate" philosophy is if you go to a wedding of people who had the good sense to host what they could afford and it was say $15pp, do you as a guest who might give $200 at a ritzier wedding just give them $20 and feel like a good person? It's supposed to be a heartfelt gift for their life together and you're going to skimp on it because they gave you cake & punch and not steak?

    And for a couple that expects the plate back... what... do you not invite your poorer friends to your wedding?? Or do you expect them to go into debt or decline the invite? That's just sickening. And I'd certainly hope none of my guests thought I might feel that way.

    A guest giving what they can afford and what they want to is the only thing that makes sense. Feeling social pressure to give more than you can afford makes zero sense to me.


  •  
    I do not agree with this. I think the couple should properly host the wedding they can afford. If parents offer to contribute because they want the couple to have a fancier wedding, fine. I think it's a ridiculous notion that parents should silo their contributions in a particular way based on their child's gender (the bride's parents pay for the dress, the reception, and the invitations, etc.; and the groom's parents for the RD, HM, transportation, etc.).

    What about a lesbian couple? Do their parents split the reception because they're both women? No RD? No HM? What about a gay male couple? No reception? Just an RD and HM?

    It just doesn't make sense. The couple should pay and they have the option to accept or decline any financial assistance that is offered.
    It doesn't make sense because you are splitting hairs.

    Whatever works for a couple and their respective families works. I really don't care who writes the checks.

    If both families want to contribute, then what I outlined above is a good place to start. Bride and family plan the wedding. Groom and family plan the RD and honeymoon. That might work for some, might not for others.

    Your Mileage May Vary.



    In my own case, my parents gladly paid 100% of the cost of the wedding. It was a glorious day and lots of fun. My in-laws gave us money for a honeymoon, which on their limited income was incredibly generous. My wedding was actually drama-free. It worked for us, and I wouldn't change one thing.
  • HuckSCHuckSC member
    Third Anniversary 100 Comments 25 Love Its Name Dropper
    aurianna said:
    He also thinks it's still expected that the bride's family pay for the wedding and the groom's family pay for the rehearsal dinner and he said he hopes he doesn't have any daughters because of that.

    In a time when women did not work at paid jobs outside the home, a young woman was supported by her father up until her wedding, then was "given away" to the husband who would support her from then on.

    A new husband has his hands full figuring out how to support a new wife and possibly future children. Thus, the bride's father paid for the wedding. The groom's father was prepared to help support the new couple should the groom's own funds fall short.

    Those were the Bad Old Pre-Feminist Days.

    Today?

    Wedding planning is complex, and it's no good to have too many planners. Two planners with one line of communication is best. (Bride and her mother. Bride and groom.) When you get too many planners, there are too many lines of communication and too many chances for foul-ups.

    Thus, today, in my opinion, I think it best for the bride and her family (usually mom could be dad) to plan and pay for the wedding and the groom and his family (mom or dad) to plan and pay for the rehearsal dinner and honeymoon. The rehearsal dinner gives the groom's parents an opportunity to host their own event, inviting who they choose, etc. 

    That's ideal, and as we know little in life is ideal.

    The co-workers in the story are naïve.
    This is so ridiculous. Who ever wants the wedding should be the one paying and planning it. If that is the couple then the couple plans and pays. The brides parents should not be involved unless the couple wants them to be.
  • HuckSC said:
     
    This is so ridiculous. Who ever wants the wedding should be the one paying and planning it. If that is the couple then the couple plans and pays. The brides parents should not be involved unless the couple wants them to be.

    My parents paid 100% of the cost of my wedding, and I am forever grateful they did. We were grad students at the time and had no money. My mom did the lion's share of the planning, and I still think of her with gratitude. She was a champ. Best. Mom. Ever.
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards