I wasn't sure where to post this, but I had to start this discussion. What is everyone's opinion of "promise" rings? I personally, think they are pretty stupid. Isn't an engagement ring a symbol of a promise? Why have a ring before the engagement ring? I guess the whole idea just seems juvenile to me. If you want to get a ring as a gift, call it a gift, not a promise ring.
Re: "Promise" Rings
We got a "promise" ring because we didn't have the money for an engagement ring. It may sound stupid, but neither of us were comfortable being engaged and not having a ring for me. It works for some people, but I know I wouldn't have liked it. So, we found a $20 ring on amazon. I still wear it on my right hand.
Funny thing is that less than a month after we got that ring, my mom decided she wanted to give her mother's engagement ring to me and DH (then BF). We were officially engaged after that was resized for me.
I was always a bit confused on it as well. If the engagement is technically a promise, then is the promise ring a symbol of your promise to promise? I don't know.
I've always just figured that it has meaning for the couple even if I didn't personally understand it.
Officially hitched as of 10/25/13
So was the original intention to be engaged, but you just needed to get an affordable ring at first?
I'm just genuinely curious.
I find that, on here, some people have different definitions of engagement than I do. Some people believe you need to have a ring to be engaged, but to me, just the plan to get married is engagement, ring or not. Even a $20 ring can be an engagement ring, by my definition.
Of course, some people may disagree with that.
Officially hitched as of 10/25/13
This is mine:
It's small but I love it and wear it proudly every day. It's a gift from him and a reminder of everything we've been through together (you change a lot between 17 and 23).
I think that it IS juvenile, but it's ok for juveniles... like kids in HS/College who really AREN'T ready for marriage at that point (some are, but most aren't). I think that a promise ring is a promise of commitment, something with more meaning than a gift, but not everyone is in the position to get married when they decide they want to commit their lives to each other. And they may not be ready to do so for several reasons (money, ability to devote their time, leaving for a job, leaving for college, etc.)
I think that giving promise rings past the age of like 25 or so are kind of odd? I guess you could say?, but not necessarily stupid.
To the bolded-no, it wasn't. We did not consider ourselves to be engaged at that point. We just knew it was going to happen later on. FTR, we have the same view on what promise rings are for.
For me, I didn't want to be "engaged", and wear a ring on my left hand unless it was the ring I was going to be wearing for the rest of my life. Then again, I'm weird like that. We were planning to start saving for an engagement ring, but then fate took its course.
I was 23 when this happened. I didn't go around flaunting the ring as a promise ring-just a ring that my BF gave me, if anyone asked. It was labeled as a promise ring on Amazon, and I liked the way it looked. It doesn't have to be juvenille unless you make it that way.
I gotcha. What matters is that it had meaning for you.
Officially hitched as of 10/25/13
Exactly!
I was 22 at the time and he was 30, but I loved it.
FFIL gave his girlfriend an emerald ring and called it a "I promise not to marry you and you promise not to marry me" ring since neither wants to get married again.
Previously Alaynajuliana
I wore a Claddagh ring on my left hand from about 9 months of dating until we got engaged after dating for almost 4 years. For us it was a symbol that we one day planned to get married, but were not able to at that point in time. We never really had a name for it, but if anyone asked we explained what the Claddagh stands for in Gaelic. After we were engaged I wore it on my right hand until it got mangled in a car accident.
Previously Alaynajuliana
Previously Alaynajuliana