http://tinyurl.com/4b4s2ey
Second letter:
Dear Miss Manners,
Is it vulgar to have one's anatomy show through two layers of clothing? A friend of mine was rebuked by a congregant after a mass in which she participated, because the outline of her nipples could be seen through her clothing which was totally appropriate, but the building was chilly.I told my friend it was rude of the congregant to say anything. My friend was mortified and purchased new padded bras. My own nipples are permanent "outties," and I don't have the option of padded bras in my size. I am not going to buy those adhesive nipple covers, and I am not going to stuff my bra with anything. I'm a 54-year-old grandma, neither a cougar or a vixen, just at peace with my body, but am I being a scoff-manners?Gentle Reader,
Of course you are. What your friend did inadvertently and has now moved to correct is something you now plan to do deliberately. Whether this convention is unfair or sexist is not the point; you know that violating it offends people.That you apparently have not considered the ordinary precaution of wearing non-revealing clothing suggests to Miss Manners that you rather relish the idea of confronting the rude congregant who takes it upon himself to inspect bosoms and lodge accusations. That should certainly be an etiquette standoff.-----------------------------------"Non-revealing clothing" doesn't prevent highbeams, yo. I think MM is completely off, and that the person who mentioned the nips to the lady in church is the rude one. What says WW?