this is the code for the render ad
Getting in Shape

What's easier for you: changing your diet or changing your activity level?

Both of these are such important part of overall health and weight loss or maintenance, but I find that everyone finds one easier than the other. Some people would prefer to eat healthier and not have to build in an hour a day to work out, but some just cannot give up their favorite treats but have no problem making it to the gym.

For me, I love to work out. I would go to the gym every day if I could fit it in. I love seeing the progress I'm making and am more energetic afterward. I have so much trouble eating healthy. Everything is a temptation, and we go out to eat a lot. I'm slowly trying to turn things around, and my trainer gave me some "eat this/not that" type recommendations based on my food journals. However, I have a lot of trouble turning around the bad food habits I've had since childhood.

Re: What's easier for you: changing your diet or changing your activity level?

  • I'm the same as you.  I have a really hard time eating well and have a lot of "food issues."  I love to exercise, though, so it isn't as much of a problem. 
    Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • I have a really hard time changing my diet. I even spent 6 years doing degrees in Nutrition, but it's still a personal struggle for me. It's so much easier to go to the gym or do some zumba dancing at home with the wii game, but I can't resist the sweetness of chocolate, or diet pepsi.

    image
    Married as of June 22, 2013!!!

    image
  • Wow, I guess most of us have bigger issues with eating than activity!

    I'm the same - I can endlessly work out so long as I can eat the bad for me stuff I love so much (like chocolate and ice cream). Over time I've gotten BETTER with food, but it's still my major weakness.

    Over the next couple of months, I really want to try on working towards having a HEALTHY amount of activity (without going overboard) balanced with mostly good diet. Right now I feel like I'm going crazy with the exercise so I'm ABLE to eat the bad for me stuff, and I think that's a mildly bad approach when it's all the time (versus for special occassions).
    image
  • AdeleDazeemAdeleDazeem member
    5000 Comments Fifth Anniversary 25 Love Its Name Dropper
    edited March 2013
    Both... ish.  I tend to think of them like a seesaw - if I move a lot, then I watch my eating less; if I'm not moving so much, then I watch my food like a hawk.

    I naturally walk all over the place since we live in the city.  I was trying to remember the last time I drove a car and it was some time last summer, I think...  We have public transit and I usually take it only one direction each day but if I need to move more, I'll walk both ways (about 3 miles total) every day. 

    Fitting in a run has been a nightmare, however.  I'm doing a program and each block is about an hour.  Balancing hydration, eating, sunlight, temperature, and energy on a work day is kinda hard.  It'll get easier now that the sun is up much longer after work!

  • edited March 2013
    For me it's a lot easier to work out more than to eat less. I caught the exercise bug long ago and feel really crappy when I don't work out.I eat healthy about 80-90% of the time and the longer I'm Primal the easier it is to control and resist the cravings. But I do love to eat and am the type who could always eat, regardless of my actual hunger levels. And I am at a healthy weight and at this point leaning out further is all about the work that is done in the kitchen, not in the gym. But I find it virtually impossible to eat at a deficit consistently enough to yield further fat loss results. For me the issue, after many many many years of struggling, it not dialing into the quality of what I'm eating - it's the quantity.
  • It's much easier for me to control my eating than to motivate myself to exercise more. There are weeks where I do little to no exercise - I feel guilty about that when it happens. I'm not someone who struggles to stay within my calorie alottment. I feel like I can eat enough, even snack a fair bit and stay where I'm supposed to be, or end up a hundred calories or so under! I do have treats, but I don't count that as eating poorly... I count that as part of staying sane and alive? :)
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    LilySlim Weight loss tickers
    Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • Activity level by a LAND SLIDE.
    I love being at the gym. It's my escape. I have no problem doing 3 gym classes in a row, but being really good about sweet or chips has taken a looooooooooooooooonnng time. And even now I know that it's easy to fall of the horse if I'm not paying attention. THat's why I just don't keep the crap in my house. 
  • It was activity level, but now both aren't bad for me.  It's just that, if I stop either, I have trouble re-starting, and I have a worse time re-starting at the gym. 
    It took me a good two years to get the food down, and now a plate of my homemade cookies can last for a week in our house, with me limiting myself to one a night, and only sometimes splurging for two. 
    Anniversary
  • Absolutely upping my activity is easier. I've always been athletic and I love to run and workout. I went four days without a "workout" this past week/weekend and was nearly ready to kill someone last night I was so anxious to get back into the gym. I do not have the ability to say no to pizza, so definitely more activity, without a doubt. 
                                                                                  Follow Me on Pinterest
  • I am an unhealthy eater but I am an overeater. Which at some point becomes unhealthy. I take the motto of the"clean plate club" to heart. But working out, sweating, is how I clear my head.
    BabyFruit Ticker
  • I'm a terrible eater. It's easier to up activity, for sure.
  • I'm so much better at upping activity too. It's so hard for me to find willpower when I'm around tasty food and drink!
    Wedding Countdown Ticker
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards