Ummm wait a second!

Nebb · December 2009

I just saw on cnn "the buzz" or something, that the director of the next harry potter movie has announced there is going to be a sexy scene between Harry and Hermoine. What?!

How the hell does THAT work! I hate it when they add nonsense to movies based on books.

Yes, I realize im showing my inner nerd right now.

anna.oskar · December 2009

That's not cool!

I agree. I hate it when they differ from the book simply so that they can make a more visually stimulating movie for the non-book readers. Plus, they leave out stuff I really liked in the book.

pandasquishy · December 2009

That's going to be awkward to watch, I'm sure.

Nebb · December 2009

If ANYONE should be having a sex scene its ron and hermoine. Apparently the director completely failed to read the book.

anna.oskar · December 2009

I want a flitwick and minerva sex scene. If we're making stuff up anyway.

TurtlesAllTheWayDown · December 2009

I hope I don't offend anyone here, but I hate Harry/Hermione shippers. They claim there's ALL this evidence in the book that could lead to the conclusion that Harry and Hermione are in love. Well, in the first 5 books at least. Um, no there's not. Go back and work on your reading comprehension. It's called "friendship."

Nebb · December 2009

Umm what mery?! Theres no way!! She has obvously had the hots for ron almost the whole series until they are finally kind of together in the last one. IE - thats why she threw a fit when ron was dating someone, and not when harry was. Good lord.

sarahmk5 · December 2009

http://blog.zap2it.com/thedishrag/2009/12/harry-potters-daniel-radcliffe-and-emma-watson-will-be-in-nude-scene-uh-oh-ron.html

Radcliffe will be getting naked for a scene in which his character Harry and friend Ron (Rupert Grint) battle a monster. The creature uses magic to project an intimate scene between Harry and a woman.

So they're not really twisting the plot, they're just taking what the horocrux does to another level.

julezlee · December 2009

Thankfully, it looks like it's just a magic sequence where someone is putting those images into Ron's head. They're not actually creating a Harry/Hermione love story line.

Nebb · December 2009

Oh thank god, they certainly didnt point that out on the segment I watched. I hate when they add/remove/change things.

sucrets4 · December 2009

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_ummm-wait-second?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:9Discussion:930cfffb-9231-4e28-a531-084196a5b6b7Post:d49822cb-0420-4ae8-9572-ea1fd07b2097">Re: Ummm wait a second!</a>:
[QUOTE]<a href="http://blog.zap2it.com/thedishrag/2009/12/harry-potters-daniel-radcliffe-and-emma-watson-will-be-in-nude-scene-uh-oh-ron.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.zap2it.com/thedishrag/2009/12/harry-potters-daniel-radcliffe-and-emma-watson-will-be-in-nude-scene-uh-oh-ron.html</a> Radcliffe will be getting naked for a scene in which his character Harry and friend Ron (Rupert Grint) battle a monster. The creature uses magic to project an intimate scene between Harry and a woman. So they're not really twisting the plot, they're just taking what the horocrux does to another level.
Posted by sarahmk5[/QUOTE]

Shiit, will Radcliffe drop his pants for anyone now? I guess a movie isn't as bad as running around a stage buck nekkid. I clearly saw his [average sized] peen swinging in the breeze in Equus.

Nebb · December 2009

I wasnt overly impressed with his peen either, Meh.

louisvillebride21 · December 2009

Ok, if that's what they're doing, then that's pretty much what happened during that horribly long forest scene. I think it happens when Ron is wearing the Horricrux one time. I believe that's when he storms off and just leaves them.

jasmineh7777 · December 2009

That seems rather inappropriate for a movie that lots of children are going to see.
I am all for sex and violence in my rated R movies, not so much for ones my little brother will want to see.

sarahmk5 · December 2009

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_ummm-wait-second?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:9Discussion:930cfffb-9231-4e28-a531-084196a5b6b7Post:bdde61a0-1c38-4c39-af00-cd5000aff7a3">Re: Ummm wait a second!</a>:
[QUOTE]That seems rather inappropriate for a movie that lots of children are going to see. I am all for sex and violence in my rated R movies, not so much for ones my little brother will want to see.
Posted by jasmineh7777[/QUOTE]

But the thing is the later movies and books have more adult themes. The other movies got a PG-13 rating, so I'm sure this one will, too.

janedoe1113a · December 2009

Still seems inappropriate for PG13.

sarahmk5 · December 2009

Then maybe it should be rated R. I agree that kids shouldn't see movies with percieved nudity in it, but that's why the rating system exists: so parents can make an informed decision on what movies they allow their kids to see. Frankly, I don't think it's a big deal for a 13-year-old to see that (if it does get a PG-13 rating).

tbh33 · December 2009

yeah they are actually taking that from the book. Every time Ron wears the horocrux (locket) he imagines harry and hermione getting together and making fun of him, which is partly why he leaves the group.

thesuninherhead · December 2009

I think it's just something like they flick to a 'vision' in Ron's head in which the two of them are in a suggestive pose? I highly doubt it's going to be very saucy.

Not that I have even seen the movies or read the book! I just happened by this in a magazine I was reading at work the other day.

Ummm wait a second!

Re: Ummm wait a second!

Choose Another Board

Search Boards