Wedding Etiquette Forum

Dj question/concern

In order to cut cost, my mom suggestes that her friend who Dj's at the local pub on the weekends Dj our wedding. This was all fine and dandy with me until I spoke to him the other day, he says that he would have to leave my reception an hour before it's over in order to get to the pub to Dj there..I don't really feel comfortable with that since he will be breaking down equipment in front of my guest, my mom says it's not a big deal. But I think it's tacky to A) have him stop playing music before people leave and B) to be breaking down and moving speakers and stuff while people are still there.What do you think? Would this bother you?

Re: Dj question/concern

  • I'm just going to answer the same as everyone else, so I'll just let them answer and me NOT answer so that you don't get annoyed.
    image
    Vacation with Alix, Andy, Mandy, and FLORENCE. AND HER MACHINE.

    The Margarita Evolution
    image
  • Honestly to me it would depened on how much $$ it would be saving me.
  • I'm just going to answer the same as everyone else, so I'll just let them answer and me NOT answer so that you don't get annoyed.
  • Honestly to me it would depened on how much $$ it would be saving me. I know! it's saving ALOT, like 450, which is great, but sheesh.
  • Yes.

    image
    Everything the light touches is my kingdom.
  • No, it's one thing to stop playing music early to actually break everything down, no way.  Your guests will think the reception is over and they will leave.  Usually a typical DJ stops playing about 30 minutes before the reception is over and that's the signal for guests to wrap it up and say their goodbyes.  He shouldn't actually start breaking things down until the party is actually over.  I would say no thanks on the offer.
    image
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • If cutting costs is going to cause that much of a disturbance, I'd go ahead and hire a dj that can devote the entire night to your event.
    image
  • If the DJ is breaking down his equipment, the party's over.  You may still have the hall for an hour, but it's going to be a signal to all of the guests that it's time to go.What about going the iPod route for the music, and your mom's DJ friend could just MC?  That way he won't have any equipment to break down, and since there's usually not a whole lot to announce in the last hour, his absence won't be nearly as noticeable.
    This is a neglected planning bio.
    This is a belated married bio, with no reviews yet because I'm lazy.

    image
    Sometimes I feel like people think that brides are delicate little flower princesses who get all dressed up and pretty for one special moment of their dreams, when really they're just normal people who just happen to be getting married. Things shouldn't have to be sugar-coated for grown-ass women. -mstar284
  • Yes, it would bother me, and I'd just prepare for your guests to leave before that final hour is up (i.e., when the music stops). If you want to have that last hour, I'd find another DJ. My thoughts exactly, but my mom doesn't see it this way. but then again she's not paying for it.
  • To me? No...it's not worth it. Not even w/the $450 savings. I would plan on your wedding to end when the DJ leaves. The music will stop...people will see him packing up...and they will be confused.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • When the DJ packs up and leaves, your guests will feel that the party is over, and they will leave too. Are you ok with that?Myself, I wouldn't do it. We're toying with the idea of giving the DJ job to one of FI's friends, but before we do it we are going to talk to him and make sure he is compatible with what we want for our wedding. If it's not going to work out, we don't want to stress the friendship.
    imageimage
    Our Story MAJORLY UPDATED 8/6/09
    Wouldn't it be nice to live together in the kind of world where we belong?
  • You have some time....I would still search around. Professionally he should not take your wedding as a job unless he will be fully commited to it....
  • What about going the iPod route for the music, and your mom's DJ friend could just MC? That way he won't have any equipment to break down, and since there's usually not a whole lot to announce in the last hour, his absence won't be nearly as noticeable.Good idea, but he doesn't even want to MC. Lol. I think I will just find another.
  • When the DJ packs up and leaves, your guests will feel that the party is over, and they will leave too. Are you ok with that?Myself, I wouldn't do it. We're toying with the idea of giving the DJ job to one of FI's friends, but before we do it we are going to talk to him and make sure he is compatible with what we want for our wedding. If it's not going to work out, we don't want to stress the friendship.I agree with you 100%. I don't feel comfy with this. I'm already having wedding nightmares about the music not working  properly.
  • i would agree with the ipod route, especially if he's not even going to MC.  not worth it.
    Lilypie Third Birthday tickers
    Lilypie Maternity tickers

    It's Always Sunny on St. Paddy's Day
    image
  • yes it would bother me. Besides, if you're not going to have a DJ for the last hour of the reception, that seems a little strange.
    image
  • Is it possible to start things earlier so that you still have him there for the whole party?Otherwise, I would start looking elsewhere.
  • #1 - don't mix friends w/ business.  This goes double for family friends. #2 - what he is saying is that your event isn't as important as his "real" job.  If he's taking your money, then your event should be his priority. 
    Holy Crap. We survived the first year!
    http://tidetravel.weebly.com/index.html
    image
    Lilypie Third Birthday tickersLilypie Second Birthday tickers
  • Thanks guys, I am just going to nix the whole idea.
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards