Wedding Etiquette Forum

WE GET IT!

WALLY CITED CRANES!!! 

And go.............
«1

Re: WE GET IT!

  • NYU hates her SM...we get it!
  • Really, because I don't think we get it. [sarcasm/]
    image

    Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_we-get-it-9?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:5f9c8ee6-2115-4bc9-8dfe-27bef5ddf55bPost:40c4c123-bae1-48e1-b81a-060b1960eb23">Re: WE GET IT!</a>:
    [QUOTE]Really, because I don't think we get it. [sarcasm/]
    Posted by rsanna[/QUOTE]

    I know I don't get it.
    Items for sale & Detroit vendor Reviews:
    www.detroitwedding.weebly.com
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic Daisypath Anniversary tickers
  • Yeah I mean, she only mentioned Wally 12 times.  Everyone knows no one can get something until they say it at least 13 times.
    image

    Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • And shocking - Emily Post lists the stepparent(s) names on the invite.

    She needs to be pushed off a bridge... in front of a train... wearing lead boots...
  • NYU is too warped to ever understand etiquette. Her PPD will be a total disaster.
  • I'm still standing by little fantasy of what Daddy Warbucks will have to say about those invitations.  He's paying (and hosting I think?) so he gets to issue them.  I so want to be a fly on the wall for that.

    It's just as well for Wally to learn the truth anyway.  She really sucks at all this wedding stuff and being a stepmom.  
  • willywally5willywally5 member
    2500 Comments
    edited August 2012
    Someone take my computer away so I quit feeding her! GAH!. 

    She makes me so farking mad. I will try my darnedest to not anwer her anymore. 

    Should I be creeped out? Damn, she might kidnap one of my kids for ransom to pay for her PPD if Daddy pulls the funding! Wink

    ETA: I now, KMMSSG. I'm pretty much THE WORST SM in the history of the world. You know all those evil SM in the fairy tales? They've got nothing on me. 
    image
  • In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_we-get-it-9?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:5f9c8ee6-2115-4bc9-8dfe-27bef5ddf55bPost:59238ac5-5741-4b99-9075-39134a2cc481">Re: WE GET IT!</a>:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: WE GET IT! : No, because you're a immature brat.
    Posted by rachers1017[/QUOTE]

    Like.
    image

    Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_we-get-it-9?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:5f9c8ee6-2115-4bc9-8dfe-27bef5ddf55bPost:53474225-a2de-4102-8d5f-cbddd091c7a3">Re: WE GET IT!</a>:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: WE GET IT! : Because I won't put my SM on invite, the wedding will be a disaster?  
    Posted by NYUgirl100[/QUOTE]

    No, because you have such a piss-poor attitude about the feelings of your father, your wedding will be a disaster. Or, how about, because you are so short-sighted and narrow-minded, your wedding will be a diasater.
  • I love the "Dad hasn't mentioned anything about putting her on the invite" - umm, probably because any decent human being wouldn't think they HAVE to request permission to put their WIFE whom they share finances with on the invite for the event that they are paying for.

    She makes me stabby.
  • In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_we-get-it-9?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:5f9c8ee6-2115-4bc9-8dfe-27bef5ddf55bPost:dc23b470-e44b-40b9-b2dc-0d5f75633773">Re: WE GET IT!</a>:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: WE GET IT! : I'd be super creeped out, but luckily for you kidnapping requires thought and planning. Those skills don't seem to be her forte, so you're safe.  Also her wedding isn't even a real wedding it's a PPD? I missed that part. It really adds a whole new layer of clusterfuuck to the story. 
    Posted by HoorayForSoup[/QUOTE]

    I think her wedding is actually real, but since she obviously has no heart it is going to be a farce anyway. But I could be wrong.

    Wally, I think she senses a great stepparent and goes on the hunt to try and take it down.  Like a cheetah or a shark, but dumber.
    image

    Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_we-get-it-9?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:5f9c8ee6-2115-4bc9-8dfe-27bef5ddf55bPost:2aaa3603-fda8-426f-9da2-07879fd5c4a3">Re: WE GET IT!</a>:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: WE GET IT! : So even though Cranes says do not put stepparents on invite, with only limited exceptions (not relevant for me), I am a brat for not putting her name on it?  Too funny. 
    Posted by NYUgirl100[/QUOTE]

    <strong>WHERE DOES IT SAY "DO NOT PUT STEPPARENTS ON THE INVITE"?!?!

    </strong>Once again, you twist things to suit your warped little world. WHAT YOU QUOTED said they "may" be listed. MAY. Not that they shouldn't.

    God you a fraggin MORON.
  • In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_we-get-it-9?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:5f9c8ee6-2115-4bc9-8dfe-27bef5ddf55bPost:2aaa3603-fda8-426f-9da2-07879fd5c4a3">Re: WE GET IT!</a>:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: WE GET IT! : So even though Cranes says do not put stepparents on invite, with only limited exceptions (not relevant for me), I am a brat for not putting her name on it?  Too funny. 
    Posted by NYUgirl100[/QUOTE]

    You're a brat becuase you don't give a flying fuuuuuuuck about anyone's feelings.  You're also being a user, since you're allowing your dad to pay for your wedding and not placing the blame on his shoulders for cheating on your mother all those years ago.  You want your wedding paid for, so you'll place the blame on his wife, so you have something to be mad at.  You really need to seek some counseling, because it must be a miserable exsistence to harbor all that pent up anger.

    And FTR, in case you haven't gotten it yet...your dad is just as much of a hoar as you seem to think your SM is.
  • In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_we-get-it-9?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:5f9c8ee6-2115-4bc9-8dfe-27bef5ddf55bPost:b6577643-f08f-49e7-8098-cd45f9a9c473">Re: WE GET IT!</a>:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: WE GET IT! : From the other thread, courtesy of Wally Re: Thank you Wally for Cranes!!! - Help with Divorced Parents and Invitations posted at 8/29/2012 10:22 PM EDT on theknot.com willywally5 Joined on 12-26-2007 SOUTH DAKOTA 9391342707887656 Posts: 2851 First: 1/27/2012 Last: 8/30/2012 From the Crane's website, I quote: Your wedding invitations should be issued by your surviving parent. His or her name appears alone on the invitational line. In most cases, stepparents’ names are not used.
    Posted by NYUgirl100[/QUOTE]

    SURVIVING parent. SURVIVING.

    In other words: if one of your parents PASSED AWAY. Not divorced and remarried.

    And from WHAT YOU POSTED: "Stepparents MAY be listed."
  • Yet you conveniently leave out ALL THE REST OF THAT POST.  The part that says if the step raised the child or is close to the child, that they may go on the invitation. 

    And it's disturbing enough you post my name constantly, knock it off with my photo and such. 

    I'm really sorry my family isn't the cluster yours is. Not my problem. 
    image
  • In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_we-get-it-9?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:9Discussion:5f9c8ee6-2115-4bc9-8dfe-27bef5ddf55bPost:55918e45-30ef-42b0-a024-a3176b9b805b">Re: WE GET IT!</a>:
    [QUOTE]Someone take my computer away so I quit feeding her! GAH!.  She makes me so farking mad. I will try my darnedest to not anwer her anymore.  Should I be creeped out? Damn, she might kidnap one of my kids for ransom to pay for her PPD if Daddy pulls the funding!  ETA: I now, KMMSSG. I'm pretty much THE WORST SM in the history of the world. You know all those evil SM in the fairy tales? They've got nothing on me. 
    Posted by willywally5[/QUOTE]<div>
    </div><div>OK, Willy, now you have just gone too far.  You think you are the worst SM in the history of the world?  Park it over there, Sunshine because that would be me.  I used to introduce myself to my stepdds' friends as C's or S's wicked stepmom.  You want to turn this into some competition?  Bring it on girlfriend.  I make Snow White's stepmom look like June Cleaver.

    </div>
  • Okay, you made me so ragey - I dug out my Emily Post etiquette book

    "In the event that relations between the bride's divorced parents (one or both of whom may be remarried) are so friendly that they share the wedding expense and act as co-hosts, both sets of names should appear on the invitation. The bride's mother's name appeas first:...
    If the bride's mother is not contributing to the cost of the wedding, the bride's father's name appears first on the invitation and he and his wife host the reception."

    In other words, your father AND HIS WIFE are a 'set' and should be included TOGETHER on the invitation as hosts.
  • In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_we-get-it-9?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:9Discussion:5f9c8ee6-2115-4bc9-8dfe-27bef5ddf55bPost:37ab2507-fbfe-46a5-ba1c-8774e2f3f490">Re: WE GET IT!</a>:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: WE GET IT! : OK, Willy, now you have just gone too far.  You think you are the worst SM in the history of the world?  Park it over there, Sunshine because that would be me.  I used to introduce myself to my stepdds' friends as C's or S's wicked stepmom.  You want to turn this into some competition?  Bring it on girlfriend.  I make Snow White's stepmom look like June Cleaver.
    Posted by kmmssg[/QUOTE]

    <div>HA! I dunno, maybe we'd be a pretty even match. I call my step mom my 'Wicked Stepmother' and then we usually both cackle! </div>
    image
  • sarabellamsarabellam member
    2500 Comments Fifth Anniversary 5 Love Its
    edited August 2012
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_we-get-it-9?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:5f9c8ee6-2115-4bc9-8dfe-27bef5ddf55bPost:5b2ecc35-4c12-4ed6-b489-52884611ed09">Re: WE GET IT!</a>:
    [QUOTE] And FTR, in case you haven't gotten it yet...your dad is just as much of a hoar as you seem to think your SM is.
    Posted by gurrlballa10[/QUOTE]

    IMO, I think Daddy-O is the bigger hoar; he's the one who broke his wedding vows
  • In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_we-get-it-9?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:5f9c8ee6-2115-4bc9-8dfe-27bef5ddf55bPost:256f4585-555d-419f-b716-0c216a7ab632">Re: WE GET IT!</a>:
    [QUOTE]Okay, you made me so ragey - I dug out my Emily Post etiquette book "In the event that relations between the bride's divorced parents (one or both of whom may be remarried) are so friendly that they share the wedding expense and act as co-hosts, both sets of names should appear on the invitation. The bride's mother's name appeas first:... If the bride's mother is not contributing to the cost of the wedding, the bride's father's name appears first on the invitation and he and his wife host the reception ." In other words, your father AND HIS WIFE are a 'set' and should be included TOGETHER on the invitation as hosts.
    Posted by KellyBrian2013[/QUOTE]

    C'mon now Kelly.  Everyone knows that logic doesn't belong in anything to do with NYU. Logic is just a hoar.
    image

    Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_we-get-it-9?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:5f9c8ee6-2115-4bc9-8dfe-27bef5ddf55bPost:c109a4f5-b11c-47f1-83e7-7089de03be2e">Re: WE GET IT!</a>:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: WE GET IT! : C'mon now Kelly.  Everyone knows that logic doesn't belong in anything to do with NYU. Logic is just a hoar.
    Posted by rsanna[/QUOTE]

    My mistake.
  • Did you see my email from Crane's concierge? You might want to take a look. Although I'm sure you will have some argument with that actual expert. 

    Seriously, you are making this a creepy, un-fun place. Don't you have a wedding to plan and Daddy's money to spend? Why don't you go get on that?

    And did you go to the chiropractor yet? Damn, that head-up-the-ass could do permanent damage if you don't get it addressed soon. It might already be too late. 


    image
  • In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_we-get-it-9?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:5f9c8ee6-2115-4bc9-8dfe-27bef5ddf55bPost:0bb0f292-a700-48d8-acaa-1239e2b18863">Re: WE GET IT!</a>:
    [QUOTE]Did you see my email from Crane's concierge? You might want to take a look. <strong>Although I'm sure you will have some argument with that actual expert.</strong>  Seriously, you are making this a creepy, un-fun place. Don't you have a wedding to plan and Daddy's money to spend? Why don't you go get on that? And did you go to the chiropractor yet? Damn, that head-up-the-ass could do permanent damage if you don't get it addressed soon. It might already be too late. 
    Posted by willywally5[/QUOTE]

    How did you know?
  • In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_we-get-it-9?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:9Discussion:5f9c8ee6-2115-4bc9-8dfe-27bef5ddf55bPost:1909b40d-801d-4803-b006-5c05782296a9">Re: WE GET IT!</a>:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: WE GET IT! : How did you know?
    Posted by KellyBrian2013[/QUOTE]

    <div>Well, among my Evil Stepmother powers is clairvoyance. So there's that. </div>
    image
  • wrigleyvillewrigleyville member
    2500 Comments Fifth Anniversary 500 Love Its First Answer
    edited August 2012
    If your father is hosting, that means father and SM are hosting, as they are married. Just because she might not be contributing financially doesn't mean she isn't included with him as a host.

    It's not just this issue, though. You give terrible advice in every thread you post in, and your world view is rather small.

    You blame your SM for your father cheating on your mother. Guess what? It takes two to have sex. Crane's doesn't mention how sex works, but perhaps you can find a biology book at the library that will explain it better and provide examples. SM may have made herself available to him, but that doesn't mean she gave him a potion and forced him to cheat. If he didn't WANT to cheat, he wouldn't have. Would you still protect him and defend his innocence if he didn't own a golden checkbook?

    I have never met another TK user who made me this stabby. Seriously. Get bent. I don't even care if I get banned over this because it needs to be said. You are a Grade A, 100% certified, bona fide thundercunt.
  • Hahahaha. You ladies are cracking me up! All of you! Keep at it! Tongue out

    April 2013 - October Siggy Challenge: Venue

    Save the Date - Music Poster Inspired STD's



    Wedding Countdown Ticker
  • In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_we-get-it-9?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:5f9c8ee6-2115-4bc9-8dfe-27bef5ddf55bPost:956e56bc-69c2-41fa-8b86-2075677e9b49">Re: WE GET IT!</a>:
    [QUOTE]If your father is hosting, that means father and SM are hosting, as they are married . Just because she might not be contributing financially doesn't mean she isn't included with him as a host. It's not just this issue, though. You give terrible advice in every thread you post in, and your world view is rather small. You blame your SM for your father cheating on your mother. Guess what? It takes two to have sex. Crane's doesn't mention how sex works, but perhaps you can find a biology book at the library that will explain it better and provide examples. SM may have made herself available to him, but that doesn't mean she gave him a potion and forced him to cheat. If he didn't WANT to cheat, he wouldn't have. Would you still protect him and defend his innocence if he didn't own a golden checkbook? I have never met another TK user who made me this stabby. Seriously. Get bent. I don't even care if I get banned over this because it needs to be said. You are a Grade A, 100% certified, bona fide thundercunt.
    Posted by wrigleyville[/QUOTE]

    This. All of this.
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards