Wedding Etiquette Forum

Had a big wedding planned but now want small, private wedding!

My fiancé and I got engaged in May of 2013 and we set the date for July 19th, 2014 in June of 2013. We sent out save the dates a few months ago but we have decided instead of the 100+ person wedding that we want to do an intimate wedding with just our immediate families, best man, maid of honor, and grandparents. How do we tell the rest of the guests that got the STDs that we are having a private wedding and they aren't invited anymore? I know I shouldn't worry about what they think, seeing as it is MY wedding and not theirs, but I want to do it in a way that people wont be upset. Please help!! 
«1

Re: Had a big wedding planned but now want small, private wedding!

  • scable12 said:
    My fiancé and I got engaged in May of 2013 and we set the date for July 19th, 2014 in June of 2013. We sent out save the dates a few months ago but we have decided instead of the 100+ person wedding that we want to do an intimate wedding with just our immediate families, best man, maid of honor, and grandparents. How do we tell the rest of the guests that got the STDs that we are having a private wedding and they aren't invited anymore? I know I shouldn't worry about what they think, seeing as it is MY wedding and not theirs, but I want to do it in a way that people wont be upset. Please help!! 

    Are you still planning to do a reception?
  • Unfortunately, no matter how you do this, it will be rude and people will be offended. You should not have sent out STDs before you were absolutely sure of what you were doing and who you were inviting. Uninviting people (which is what you are doing) is awkward no matter the reason.

    If you are set to change your plans, you absolutely have to do as PP have said and only include immediate family. No friends. No extended family. Just immediate family and tell everyone else that is what you are doing. Do no lie or invite "just a couple close friends" this will make it much worse!
  • This is why you don't send STDs until your plans are solidified.  And why you only send them to absolute VIPs.

     

    You have to tell everyone that got an STD and that is no longer invited that your plans have changed.  Or you have to continue on with your prevoius plans and invite them to the wedding.  You should "worry" about what they think because clearly you care about them enough that you were planning to invite them to your wedding.  It would be horribly rude not to inform them of the change of plans - what if some of them start buying flights and booking hotels assuming that an invitation is forthcoming and then that invitation never arrives?

  • scable12 said:
    My fiancé and I got engaged in May of 2013 and we set the date for July 19th, 2014 in June of 2013. We sent out save the dates a few months ago but we have decided instead of the 100+ person wedding that we want to do an intimate wedding with just our immediate families, best man, maid of honor, and grandparents. How do we tell the rest of the guests that got the STDs that we are having a private wedding and they aren't invited anymore? I know I shouldn't worry about what they think, seeing as it is MY wedding and not theirs, but I want to do it in a way that people wont be upset. Please help!! 

    You've already invited those you sent STDs to. A save the date is a commitment to invite that person to the wedding. The purpose of a save the date is to inform people they are invited so they can make work and travel arrangements.

    Your only polite option, other than proceeding as planned, is to cancel the current wedding and reschedule for an entirely different date (and send out a notice to everyone you sent a STD to stating "The wedding of ____ and ____ will not be taking place as scheduled").

    When you reschedule, you might want to consider not sending save the dates considering your apparently capricious nature.

    If this is a money issue, then see if you can scale way back on your plans while keeping the guests you've already invited.


    All of this.

    Anyway you approach it, I think its really rude to uninvite people simply because you changed your mind.

    BabyFruit Ticker
  • I would also scrap all of your plans and start over (probably with a different date too). After sending out cards that say "the wedding of x and y will not take place."
  • The only people that were originally invited to the wedding were extended family only, I have a very big Italian family with 5 aunts and uncles that have 5 children that have children as well. That's only on my mother's side. And when I say it is "my day" I mean just that. It is my wedding and my marriage. My parents support this decision and I was set on doing a big wedding but things change and plans change. We have planned to renew our vows in 10-15 years and do a blow out wedding. To me the big wedding wraps you up in making everyone else happy when in reality it is about my future husband and I starting our lives together. I was pressured into doing a big wedding by my fiance's mother and even a little bit by mine. It's hard not to upset everyone and make yourself happy. I'm not going to be miserable on my wedding day, that's not how it works.
    I acknowledge the fact that people will be upset when they won't be there, as if the rolls were reversed I would be a little upset too, but I recognize that the wedding is all about the bride and groom and the joining of the two. I don't need a lecture on what I SHOULD have done, it's in the past. This is about the present and the future. So if you could please leave comments that are helpful, I'd appreciate it. 

    I'll still inform all of the guests and explain why we are choosing to do a private wedding instead. Please, helpful comments only.
  • scable12 said:
    The only people that were originally invited to the wedding were extended family only, I have a very big Italian family with 5 aunts and uncles that have 5 children that have children as well. That's only on my mother's side. And when I say it is "my day" I mean just that. It is my wedding and my marriage. My parents support this decision and I was set on doing a big wedding but things change and plans change. We have planned to renew our vows in 10-15 years and do a blow out wedding. To me the big wedding wraps you up in making everyone else happy when in reality it is about my future husband and I starting our lives together. I was pressured into doing a big wedding by my fiance's mother and even a little bit by mine. It's hard not to upset everyone and make yourself happy. I'm not going to be miserable on my wedding day, that's not how it works.
    I acknowledge the fact that people will be upset when they won't be there, as if the rolls were reversed I would be a little upset too, but I recognize that the wedding is all about the bride and groom and the joining of the two. I don't need a lecture on what I SHOULD have done, it's in the past. This is about the present and the future. So if you could please leave comments that are helpful, I'd appreciate it. 

    I'll still inform all of the guests and explain why we are choosing to do a private wedding instead. Please, helpful comments only.
    Ugh.  First it isn't your day it is you and your FI day so quit it with the my wedding crap.  Also it stops just being your wedding when you involve others.

    I don't get the whole "we are planning a big blow out wedding for our 10-15 year anniversary."  First, you can't have a big blow out wedding because you would have already had one when you first wed.  Second, you don't think you are going to get pressure from your family when you go to plan that big PPD down the road?

    Look if you and your FI want to have a small wedding then go for it.  But honestly scrap the whole 10-15 year anniversary PPD carp.  Who even decides to do this before they are even married?

  • Everyone has been helpful.

    Your wedding is not "your day." It is the day that you and another person make a lifelong legal, social, and perhaps religious commitment to each other, but that does not give you either ownership of the day or the right to expect everyone to do what you want every single nanosecond of it.

    As for whether or not you can not invite anyone you sent an STD to already, while you can do that, unfortunately you may well be subjecting yourself and your FI to justified resentment on the part of the recipients of those STDs who will not be invited to your wedding.
  • I, too, am confused why you say you felt pressured into a big wedding now but plan to have a big do-over 10-15 years from now. What's the difference? 


    What did you think would happen if you walked up to a group of internet strangers and told them to get shoehorned by their lady doc?~StageManager14
    image
  • No one ever thinks their own plans or actions are rude.

    You asked the question, stop being defensive about it for a few days, think about it and proceed with the excellent advice given, or don't.

    No need to throw the time people have invested in answering your question in their faces.
    image
  • OP, everyone here has been helpful.  And when you post on a public forum, you're likely to get a large variety of opinions.

    PPs have said the only way to do this that is acceptable - which is to cancel the current wedding plans, notify all guests, and start over.

    I will say though, that if I was invited to a wedding, got notification that the wedding was cancelled, then learned that it was rescheduled to be smaller and that I was essentially un-invited, I would be offended.  You may think that your friends/extended family/etc wouldn't mind - I can guarantee someone will have hurt feelings over this.

    If I felt like I was a close friend - it could be a friendship-ending move.  It's essentially telling (indirectly) everyone that isn't invited to the "intimate" wedding that they're not special or important enough to you.

    Would having an intimate ceremony and then a reception with everyone invited be an option?  It would be a little strange to get a STD for a reception-only thing - but it's possible to have only immediate family at a ceremony and then a large reception.  

    One last thought... who is paying for the wedding?  If your parents are paying for the wedding, they should have a say in the size of the guest list and who is invited.  It makes them look inconsiderate if they are hosting a wedding and un-invite guests.
  • I would not be offended if someone decided to change to a private ceremony and I had to be uninvited. I would be if they changed from inviting 100 to 50, yes, but not if I were cut from the list so the guests were going to be less than 10 people. 


    What did you think would happen if you walked up to a group of internet strangers and told them to get shoehorned by their lady doc?~StageManager14
    image
  • I would be offended.
    image
  • vt&dt said:

    Would having an intimate ceremony and then a reception with everyone invited be an option?  It would be a little strange to get a STD for a reception-only thing - but it's possible to have only immediate family at a ceremony and then a large reception.  

    From what I gather, and my own personal opinion, this is not a good idea.  It's very rude to not invite someone to the ceremony, but expect them for the reception.  It's like saying "I don't want you around when I say I do, but come give me a gift anyway."

    Just my two cents.
  • HT to @grumbledore for use of the word 'capricious.'

    OP, you've been given good advice. The fact you don't realise that underscores my belief you're too young to get married.

    You get one wedding day --ONE. Have that now however you want it, but you don't get a big blowout in 10-15 years. You get this, whatever you have when you get married.

    If you're not old enough to cut mama's apron strings and say 'no,' you're not old enough to get married.

    And what does your FI think of all this?
    Anniversary

    image
    I'm gonna go with 'not my circus, not my monkeys.'
  • Knope2014 said:
    vt&dt said:

    Would having an intimate ceremony and then a reception with everyone invited be an option?  It would be a little strange to get a STD for a reception-only thing - but it's possible to have only immediate family at a ceremony and then a large reception.  

    From what I gather, and my own personal opinion, this is not a good idea.  It's very rude to not invite someone to the ceremony, but expect them for the reception.  It's like saying "I don't want you around when I say I do, but come give me a gift anyway."

    Just my two cents.
    It's fine to have a very intimate, private ceremony and then a larger reception. It's not ok to have like 20+ people at the ceremony and then invite more to the reception. 
    What did you think would happen if you walked up to a group of internet strangers and told them to get shoehorned by their lady doc?~StageManager14
    image
  • cowgirl8238cowgirl8238 member
    1000 Comments 500 Love Its Fourth Anniversary First Answer
    edited January 2014
    vt&dt said:
    OP, everyone here has been helpful.  And when you post on a public forum, you're likely to get a large variety of opinions.

    PPs have said the only way to do this that is acceptable - which is to cancel the current wedding plans, notify all guests, and start over.

    I will say though, that if I was invited to a wedding, got notification that the wedding was cancelled, then learned that it was rescheduled to be smaller and that I was essentially un-invited, I would be offended.  You may think that your friends/extended family/etc wouldn't mind - I can guarantee someone will have hurt feelings over this.

    If I felt like I was a close friend - it could be a friendship-ending move.  It's essentially telling (indirectly) everyone that isn't invited to the "intimate" wedding that they're not special or important enough to you.

    Would having an intimate ceremony and then a reception with everyone invited be an option?  It would be a little strange to get a STD for a reception-only thing - but it's possible to have only immediate family at a ceremony and then a large reception.  

    One last thought... who is paying for the wedding?  If your parents are paying for the wedding, they should have a say in the size of the guest list and who is invited.  It makes them look inconsiderate if they are hosting a wedding and un-invite guests.


    Please don't make the ceremony private with a larger reception.  I know it isn't technically wrong, but I don't like the vibe they give off.  To me it says you can buy us a present and party but you can't actually watch us get married.

    As far as your plans, I personally think it is rude to invite someone to a wedding and then uninvite them because you changed your mind. 

    Also add me to the camp of confused about the small wedding now big party later. How does that change anything?

    Edit to add.

  • Unless you're the Duggars and those 20+ people are your parents, siblings, siblings' spouses, and in-laws. :)
    I giggled, because between me and Fi, our parents, siblings, and sibling's SO's makes 23.  Well, 35 if you count the kids...
  • edited January 2014
    Every reply in here has been helpful, so OP, I'm really not sure why you're getting your panties in a wad. 

    I'd be offended if I was sent an STD and then told it was going to be a private affair. That's just the fact of the matter. I think you best bet is to contact the people that received the STDs and tell them the wedding isn't happening as originally planned. 
  • AddieL73 said:

    I would not be offended if someone decided to change to a private ceremony and I had to be uninvited. I would be if they changed from inviting 100 to 50, yes, but not if I were cut from the list so the guests were going to be less than 10 people. 



    I would not be offended either. It's not a personal slight.
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards