this is the code for the render ad
Community› Wedding Discussion Boards› Wedding Vows & Ceremony Discussions
Wedding Vows & Ceremony Discussions
New Discussion

Program Listing

WedMe14WedMe14 member
10 Comments First Anniversary Name Dropper
in Wedding Vows & Ceremony Discussions
When listing people in the program do you list them in the order that they're seen in the ceremony or in alphabetical order?
Report Reply to Post

Re: Program Listing

  • HisGirlFriday13HisGirlFriday13 member
    5000 Comments 500 Love Its Second Anniversary 5 Answers
    We listed ours in order they'd be seen, but our programme was somewhat unorthodox.

    There is no right or wrong way to do it, so however you want is fine.
    Anniversary

    image
    I'm gonna go with 'not my circus, not my monkeys.'
    Report Reply
  • Jen4948Jen4948 member
    Knottie Warrior 10000 Comments 500 Love Its 25 Answers
    I myself would probably list Bride, Groom, Bride's Parents, Groom's Parents, MOH, Best Man, Bridesmaids, Groomsmen, Flower Girls, Ring Bearers, Ushers, and Readers in that order, but it's really up to you.
    Report Reply
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] member
    2500 Comments Fifth Anniversary 500 Love Its 5 Answers
    We did the groupings like PP said, parents, groomsmen, bridesmaid & for the GM & BM I put them in the order they would be standing/walking out
    Report Reply
  • theartistformerlyknownastheartistformerlyknownas member
    10000 Comments 500 Love Its 5 Answers First Anniversary
    edited May 2014
    I did a graphic with little silhouettes of everyone (using stock images, not their actual photos) with their names under them in the order they'll be standing up front. Typically the order they process in is the opposite of the order they'll stand (MOH enters last but stands the closest).
    image
    image
    Report Reply
  • JennyColadaJennyColada member
    2500 Comments 500 Love Its Third Anniversary First Answer
    Jen4948 said:
    I myself would probably list Bride, Groom, Bride's Parents, Groom's Parents, MOH, Best Man, Bridesmaids, Groomsmen, Flower Girls, Ring Bearers, Ushers, and Readers in that order, but it's really up to you.
    So, like, order of importance or whatever?

    If I were having a larger wedding with a program, I'd probably do this as well.
    Report Reply
  • Jen4948Jen4948 member
    Knottie Warrior 10000 Comments 500 Love Its 25 Answers
    Jennycolada said:
    Jen4948 said:
    I myself would probably list Bride, Groom, Bride's Parents, Groom's Parents, MOH, Best Man, Bridesmaids, Groomsmen, Flower Girls, Ring Bearers, Ushers, and Readers in that order, but it's really up to you.
    So, like, order of importance or whatever?

    If I were having a larger wedding with a program, I'd probably do this as well.
    Yeah, I guess so.
    Report Reply
  • JennyColadaJennyColada member
    2500 Comments 500 Love Its Third Anniversary First Answer
    Jen4948 said:


    Jennycolada said:


    Jen4948 said:

    I myself would probably list Bride, Groom, Bride's Parents, Groom's Parents, MOH, Best Man, Bridesmaids, Groomsmen, Flower Girls, Ring Bearers, Ushers, and Readers in that order, but it's really up to you.



    So, like, order of importance or whatever?

    If I were having a larger wedding with a program, I'd probably do this as well.

    Yeah, I guess so.
    ---
    I didn't mean that in a rude way or anything, I just wasn't sure how else to phrase it!

    Report Reply
  • Jen4948Jen4948 member
    Knottie Warrior 10000 Comments 500 Love Its 25 Answers
    Jennycolada said:
    Jennycolada said:
    Jen4948 said:
    I myself would probably list Bride, Groom, Bride's Parents, Groom's Parents, MOH, Best Man, Bridesmaids, Groomsmen, Flower Girls, Ring Bearers, Ushers, and Readers in that order, but it's really up to you.
    So, like, order of importance or whatever?

    If I were having a larger wedding with a program, I'd probably do this as well.
    Yeah, I guess so.
    --- I didn't mean that in a rude way or anything, I just wasn't sure how else to phrase it!
    That's okay.  I was sure you meant it in a totally benign way.
    Report Reply
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards