Did you guys see this?
http://time.com/2970046/j-crew-000-small-size/
So J Crew is opening up stores in Asian markets and introduced a 000 since women in those markets tend to be smaller. The 000 is also going to be offered in US markets and online, and fits a 23" waist. I just thought this was particularly interesting because J Crew already has serious vanity sizing - their clothes run super big, so if they labeled them as they actually are (i.e., a 4 should be a 4 and not a 0), then they wouldn't need to introduce this size. It is kind of insulting that manufacturers think women will shop at a store just to wear the smallest size possible - so for example, if a woman is a 4 at Banana but a 0 at J Crew, manufacturers assume women will go to J Crew. It makes me think that these companies assume women are small-minded with big egos that need to be soothed.
On the other end of the spectrum, I just bought my dress in June from Allure Couture. I knew in advance that bridal sizing is "different", and I am not offended by a number on a tag, so when they took my measurements and ordered my size I wasn't shocked. In full disclosure, I am 34-27-36. Their sizing chart is here:
http://www.allurebridals.com/sizechart. The sizing of an 8 is 35-26.5-38.5, which equals a waist-to-hip ratio of less than 0.7. I am not even sure how realistic that is. I squat heavy 3 times a week and I'm not sure I could get my booty 2.5 inches bigger. The consultant also told me that every time she has called that company to talk about sizing, she has spoken with a man - which is just a tidbit that I found interesting, that perhaps men are creating these size charts. The CEO of J Crew is a man, too.
ETA: I really did have paragraphs...