Chit Chat

PSA

124»

Re: PSA

  • Why so serious? I'd post a GIf but I'm on mobile. Your tone, her tone, my tone, lolo's tone. . . It's all the exact same fucking tone when we're responding to shit we deem stupid.
    Ya know what, PLG? I don't like your icon's face. BAM. There. I said it. 

     

    (Isn't that what we're doing here?)
    If that's a veiled criticism about me, I won't hear it and I won't respond to it.
    LEGEND.
    --

    I'm the fuck
    out.

    image
  • Honest question: how are threads like this not a TOS violation?  Because this seems to reallyyyy clearly a thread completely dedicated to singling someone out and being mean about them, and that feels like something that shouldn't be allowed.  I don't know if it's bullying or harassment or just unattractive behavior, but I'm trying to find that previously alluded to appropriate way to say it makes me uncomfortable and I do not like it.  

    I would LOVE to see how fast y'all would literally annihilate someone who made a mean comment about one of your friend's on here's pictures.  It would literally takes seconds for everyone to freak out about how SO INAPPROPRIATE it is to make fun of someone's physical appearance.  I just think it's messed up there's a pretty clear double standard going on here.
    For the record, I never made fun of her physical appearance. That would be crossing a line. 

    Petty and irrelevant? Yes, I would agree. I typed out something in my head and probably shouldn't have put it into print. Compared to throwing someone's unrelated family history in their face and wishing ill on future conception, I think it's pretty tame. 

    The troll comment was in reference to her actions and not her appearance. She happens to be on a bridge in her photo. Trolls live under bridges in fairy tales. 
    image
  • jdluvr06 said:
    @levioosa‌ she isn't selling it online yet. She is going to do a test run in her store to see how it sells before she adds it to her regular inventory.
    Boo!  Well, let me know if she starts selling it online!  I own an alarming amount of tea, and am always looking for great new ones. 


    image
  • Yeah, honestly, I'm with @themosthappy91 and (I think it was) @levioosa here - I don't think the original trajectory in this thread was necessarily bad, but the sig pic attacks were low. I do think that Maggie's attitude in going about it was not necessary, as well, though - I understand pointing out that it was unnecessary to attack her sig because shit fire, I'm doing it, but we're all (mostly) adults here, and should be treated as such. It's a simple thing to say, "Hey, that was low" without being condescending about it.

    I was proudly "down in the drama" over on the other thread - I tried not to get involved in it because I frankly don't care about her trying to rejoin TK, lies or no lies, because I like to think that TK is an accepting place as a general rule, and because I've made friends here. But if I'm not mistaken, I got drawn in after her extremely low attack on Lolo (I would check to confirm, but the thread is gone).
    Daisypath Wedding tickers
    image
  • Oh yea? Well @ShesSoCold your dog is drooling.
    How DARE you! She's manufactured to do that!
    Image result for someecard betting someone half your shit youll love them forever










  • I'm sorry, my attitude?  What exactly is wrong with my attitude?  Because I think this thread is juvenile and am calling you all out for it?  Really?  So if I don't just jump in and participate and join in on mocking BSJB then I have a bad attitude?

    You tend to have a bad attitude a lot of the time, but whatever.

    GUYS, The quote trees. STAHP.

    I am so shocked that you think this!

    image

    I really don't mind or care if you agree or disagree with me. It's very obvious that we don't like each other and probably never will again. But this is one of multiple threads in this forum alone where you have come in and immediately taken a tone like a school marm. There's a way to say "I'm uncomfortable with personally attacking someone's photos / appearance" without immediately belittling everyone else.
    And I know you will neither like nor agree with what I'm saying and will have some kind of snappy retort, so you might as well ignore me so I don't piss you off further. But don't expect anyone to take your words to heart when they come with that tone.


    Why so serious? I'd post a GIf but I'm on mobile.

    Your tone, her tone, my tone, lolo's tone. . . It's all the exact same fucking tone when we're responding to shit we deem stupid.



    Ya know what, PLG? I don't like your icon's face. BAM. There. I said it. 































    (Isn't that what we're doing here?)


    Wooooah. We don't hate on the Smoosh.

    I'll cut you!


    "Love is the one thing we're capable of perceiving that transcends time and space."






  • Why so serious? I'd post a GIf but I'm on mobile.

    Your tone, her tone, my tone, lolo's tone. . . It's all the exact same fucking tone when we're responding to shit we deem stupid.

    Ya know what, PLG? I don't like your icon's face. BAM. There. I said it. 

     

    (Isn't that what we're doing here?)



    If that's a veiled criticism about me, I won't hear it and I won't respond to it.


    Ok, now I'm just lost.

    "Love is the one thing we're capable of perceiving that transcends time and space."


  • maeday2 said:
    Honest question: how are threads like this not a TOS violation?  Because this seems to reallyyyy clearly a thread completely dedicated to singling someone out and being mean about them, and that feels like something that shouldn't be allowed.  I don't know if it's bullying or harassment or just unattractive behavior, but I'm trying to find that previously alluded to appropriate way to say it makes me uncomfortable and I do not like it.  

    I would LOVE to see how fast y'all would literally annihilate someone who made a mean comment about one of your friend's on here's pictures.  It would literally takes seconds for everyone to freak out about how SO INAPPROPRIATE it is to make fun of someone's physical appearance.  I just think it's messed up there's a pretty clear double standard going on here.
    For the record, I never made fun of her physical appearance. That would be crossing a line. 

    Petty and irrelevant? Yes, I would agree. I typed out something in my head and probably shouldn't have put it into print. Compared to throwing someone's unrelated family history in their face and wishing ill on future conception, I think it's pretty tame. 

    The troll comment was in reference to her actions and not her appearance. She happens to be on a bridge in her photo. Trolls live under bridges in fairy tales. 
    That's completely understandable, we all say write things on here without thinking sometimes.

    For the record, what I REALLY don't understand is the existence of this thread in the first place.  It seems mean and inappropriate to make a thread singling out one user and talking shit about her, whether that shit talking is about her appearance or whatever else.  I'm genuinely surprised this isn't a TOS violation because to me it feels like bullying/harassment.  
  • Yeah, honestly, I'm with @themosthappy91 and (I think it was) @levioosa here - I don't think the original trajectory in this thread was necessarily bad, but the sig pic attacks were low. I do think that Maggie's attitude in going about it was not necessary, as well, though - I understand pointing out that it was unnecessary to attack her sig because shit fire, I'm doing it, but we're all (mostly) adults here, and should be treated as such. It's a simple thing to say, "Hey, that was low" without being condescending about it.

    I was proudly "down in the drama" over on the other thread - I tried not to get involved in it because I frankly don't care about her trying to rejoin TK, lies or no lies, because I like to think that TK is an accepting place as a general rule, and because I've made friends here. But if I'm not mistaken, I got drawn in after her extremely low attack on Lolo (I would check to confirm, but the thread is gone).
    Yeah, honestly, I'm with @themosthappy91 and (I think it was) @levioosa here - I don't think the original trajectory in this thread was necessarily bad, but the sig pic attacks were low. I do think that Maggie's attitude in going about it was not necessary, as well, though - I understand pointing out that it was unnecessary to attack her sig because shit fire, I'm doing it, but we're all (mostly) adults here, and should be treated as such. It's a simple thing to say, "Hey, that was low" without being condescending about it.

    I was proudly "down in the drama" over on the other thread - I tried not to get involved in it because I frankly don't care about her trying to rejoin TK, lies or no lies, because I like to think that TK is an accepting place as a general rule, and because I've made friends here. But if I'm not mistaken, I got drawn in after her extremely low attack on Lolo (I would check to confirm, but the thread is gone).
    Um. . . . where are we, WW or WB all of a sudden?

    All of the regs here are snarky a huge percentage of the time, but all of a sudden someone's tone is too condescending for people participating in a thread that is delicately tap dancing around being a TOS violation of snark?

    Seriously?  Maybe I don't get it because I'm ill right now. . .

    Just let me know if I'm going to need to whip out my Oprah GIF for this thread.

    "Love is the one thing we're capable of perceiving that transcends time and space."


  • Yeah, honestly, I'm with @themosthappy91 and (I think it was) @levioosa here - I don't think the original trajectory in this thread was necessarily bad, but the sig pic attacks were low. I do think that Maggie's attitude in going about it was not necessary, as well, though - I understand pointing out that it was unnecessary to attack her sig because shit fire, I'm doing it, but we're all (mostly) adults here, and should be treated as such. It's a simple thing to say, "Hey, that was low" without being condescending about it.

    I was proudly "down in the drama" over on the other thread - I tried not to get involved in it because I frankly don't care about her trying to rejoin TK, lies or no lies, because I like to think that TK is an accepting place as a general rule, and because I've made friends here. But if I'm not mistaken, I got drawn in after her extremely low attack on Lolo (I would check to confirm, but the thread is gone).
    Yeah, honestly, I'm with @themosthappy91 and (I think it was) @levioosa here - I don't think the original trajectory in this thread was necessarily bad, but the sig pic attacks were low. I do think that Maggie's attitude in going about it was not necessary, as well, though - I understand pointing out that it was unnecessary to attack her sig because shit fire, I'm doing it, but we're all (mostly) adults here, and should be treated as such. It's a simple thing to say, "Hey, that was low" without being condescending about it.

    I was proudly "down in the drama" over on the other thread - I tried not to get involved in it because I frankly don't care about her trying to rejoin TK, lies or no lies, because I like to think that TK is an accepting place as a general rule, and because I've made friends here. But if I'm not mistaken, I got drawn in after her extremely low attack on Lolo (I would check to confirm, but the thread is gone).
    Um. . . . where are we, WW or WB all of a sudden?

    All of the regs here are snarky a huge percentage of the time, but all of a sudden someone's tone is too condescending for people participating in a thread that is delicately tap dancing around being a TOS violation of snark?

    Seriously?  Maybe I don't get it because I'm ill right now. . .

    Just let me know if I'm going to need to whip out my Oprah GIF for this thread.
    FTR, I'm not commenting about any specific poster, just the idea of attacking a personal picture in general. 


    image
  • larrygagalarrygaga member
    2500 Comments 500 Love Its First Anniversary First Answer
    edited December 2014
    Well I acted like a child because I still am a child so THERE


    image
    Wedding Countdown Ticker
    image

  • This content has been removed.
  • larrygaga said:
    Well I acted like a child because I still am a child so THERE


    image
    Own it girl!



    Just let me know if I'm going to need to whip out my Oprah GIF for this thread.
    You mean this one?

    image

    I know you don't mean this one, but it's the best one of all time.


    Close!

    "Love is the one thing we're capable of perceiving that transcends time and space."


  • Y'all.......... Sigh. I like you all. I've been here for awhile. But even I can see a bunch of juvenile behavior going down today. Newbies are noticing it. Regs are noticing it. And I totally thought this was a thread about getting your husbands to check their PSA levels to check for prostate cancer... I'm thinking we've turned into West Side Story with the Jets and the Sharks.
    I found you a piece of furniture for your new house:

    image

    It's a fainting couch. Chill.
    --

    I'm the fuck
    out.

    image
  • This content has been removed.
  • Y'all.......... Sigh. I like you all. I've been here for awhile. But even I can see a bunch of juvenile behavior going down today. Newbies are noticing it. Regs are noticing it. And I totally thought this was a thread about getting your husbands to check their PSA levels to check for prostate cancer... I'm thinking we've turned into West Side Story with the Jets and the Sharks.
    Yeah. I was honestly a little embarrased reading this thread.


    image
  • I apologized for violating any TOS by commenting on someone's pose in a sig picture. I stand by my apology. I can own up to a shitty comment I made. It crossed a line and in the future, I promise to only comment on how people conduct themselves and not the photographs they choose to represent themselves.
    image


This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards