Wedding Etiquette Forum

Deleted Post

2»

Re: Deleted Post

  • Came for the DD!

    And agreeing with PPs that head tables are really awkward/rude when not done right. I've only been to 2 weddings with head tables (one of which the head table was actually on a platform at a higher level than everyone else, really enforcing the royalty/peasant feel), and both times, the head tables only included the bride, groom, and wedding party without their significant others/dates. It definitely did not go unnoticed to most. 
    Daisypath Anniversary tickers


  • Came for the DD!

    And agreeing with PPs that head tables are really awkward/rude when not done right. I've only been to 2 weddings with head tables (one of which the head table was actually on a platform at a higher level than everyone else, really enforcing the royalty/peasant feel), and both times, the head tables only included the bride, groom, and wedding party without their significant others/dates. It definitely did not go unnoticed to most. 
    Daisypath Anniversary tickers


  • Came for the DD!

    And agreeing with PPs that head tables are really awkward/rude when not done right. I've only been to 2 weddings with head tables (one of which the head table was actually on a platform at a higher level than everyone else, really enforcing the royalty/peasant feel), and both times, the head tables only included the bride, groom, and wedding party without their significant others/dates. It definitely did not go unnoticed to most. 
    Daisypath Anniversary tickers


  • SP29SP29 member
    Sixth Anniversary 2500 Comments 500 Love Its 5 Answers
    Came for the DD as well!

    - Have a kings table
    - Have a table set up like a "T"
    - Bride and Groom sit with their parents/siblings, WP sits in like-groups of friends/family
    - B&G sit with best man + SO and MOH+SO, rest of WP sits together
    - Have two head tables that includes SOs

    So many options!!

    Usually when posters come on here trying to get validation for a bad idea they often say, "but I KNOW this wouldn't bother any of my friends/family!". Well here OP, you have a situation where someone has clearly spoken up and is bothered!! Don't ignore it.
  • Well, there was no back pedaling, temper tantrums or a flounce. Fell far short of a Ragret 

  • My fiancé was in a wedding. I didn't get to see him till the reception when they had a head table and I had to sit alone because I knew 0 people at this wedding. I was so embarrassed. 
  • I'm a little late to the game on this one, but I have to wholeheartedly agree with PPs.  My sister had a head table (it was the only real table with seats at the whole reception) and FI just kind of hovered behind me while I ate dinner and he waited to be able to eat dinner (which he almost didn't get to, because they were just about out of food when he got to go through the line...). There was a married couple in the WP and they didn't even get to sit together. It was miserable.

    For our wedding, we aren't doing a sweetheart or a head table. We're just sitting at a regular 8 top guest table with our siblings, MOH, BM, officiant and their dates. The rest of the WP will be seated with their SOs and friends at other tables.

    Daisypath Wedding tickers
    image
  • IMO - Head tables are becoming a rapid thing of the past. 
  • I've been a BM 6 times now, and was seated apart from my SO (Now FI) every time by being put at the head table w/o him. Know what? It was uncomfortable for me, not just him. I knew people, he didn't really. I spent the whole time basking in the glow of the newly wedded couple's love, feeling separated from my own love. 

    Rearrange, however necessary.

    Also, totally came here for the DD.
                        


    Daisypath Anniversary tickers
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards